قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| اختبار ت بايزي× | تحليل التباين البايزي× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | بايزي | بايزي |
| العائلة | Bayesian methods | Bayesian methods |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 2009 | 2012 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Rouder, Speckman, Sun, Morey & Iverson | Rouder, Morey, Speckman & Province |
| النوع≠ | Bayesian hypothesis test | Bayesian hypothesis test / group comparison |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D. & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t Tests for Accepting and Rejecting the Null Hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. DOI ↗ | Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L. & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes Factors for ANOVA Designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. DOI ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة≠ | bayesian two-sample t-test, bayes factor t-test, Bayesçi t-Testi | bayesian analysis of variance, bayes factor ANOVA, JZS ANOVA, Bayesçi ANOVA — Bayes Faktörü ile Grup Karşılaştırması |
| ذات صلة≠ | 5 | 4 |
| الملخص≠ | The Bayesian t-test, formalised by Rouder and colleagues in 2009, is a two-group comparison method that works within a Bayesian framework. Instead of a p-value, it produces a Bayes Factor (BF₁₀) that quantifies the evidence the data provide for the alternative hypothesis relative to the null, and it reports the full posterior distribution of the standardised effect size δ with a highest-density interval. | Bayesian ANOVA, formalised by Rouder, Morey, Speckman and Province (2012), tests whether group means differ by quantifying the evidence for the alternative hypothesis relative to the null using the Bayes Factor (BF₁₀). Unlike classical ANOVA, it can also measure evidence in favour of the null hypothesis, making it equally informative when groups do not differ. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|