ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

دراسة دقة التشخيص البايزية×تقييم الاختبارات والبرامج الفاحصة×
المجالعلم الأوبئةعلم الأوبئة
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة1995–20011968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
صاحب الطريقةJoseph, Gyorkos & Coupal; Dendukuri & Joseph (formal Bayesian DTA framework)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
النوعBayesian inferential study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
المصدر التأسيسيDendukuri, N., & Joseph, L. (2001). Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests. Biometrics, 57(1), 158–167. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
الأسماء البديلةBayesian DTA study, Bayesian test evaluation, Bayesian diagnostic test accuracy, BDASscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
ذات صلة66
الملخصA Bayesian diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a medical test distinguishes between people who have a condition and those who do not, using Bayesian statistical methods that formally incorporate prior knowledge into the estimation of sensitivity, specificity, and related measures. Unlike classical approaches that rely solely on the observed sample, Bayesian inference combines a likelihood model of the data with prior probability distributions to produce posterior estimates with intuitive credible intervals.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Bayesian Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Screening Test Evaluation. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-15 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare