قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| تحليل السيناريوهات القائم على الوكيل× | نمذجة الوكيل القائمة على سيناريوهات السياسات× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | المحاكاة | المحاكاة |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة | 1990s–2000s | 1990s–2000s |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Axelrod, R.; Schoemaker, P. J. H. (combined lineage) | Axelrod, R. and colleagues in computational social science |
| النوع≠ | Hybrid simulation–scenario method | Simulation-based policy comparison |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Axelrod, R. (1997). The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ. ISBN: 9780691015675 | Axelrod, R. (1997). The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691015675 |
| الأسماء البديلة | ABSA, ABM scenario analysis, agent-based scenario planning, scenario-driven ABM | Policy ABM, Policy Scenario ABM, Scenario-Based ABM, PS-ABM |
| ذات صلة≠ | 4 | 5 |
| الملخص≠ | Agent-based scenario analysis embeds agent-based simulation models inside a structured scenario planning framework. Researchers define two to four contrasting future scenarios, configure agent populations and environmental rules to reflect each scenario's assumptions, run the simulation under each condition, and compare emergent outcomes. This makes it possible to explore how decentralized individual behaviors aggregate into system-level consequences under radically different futures. | Policy Scenario Agent-Based Modeling (PS-ABM) is a simulation method that uses agent-based models to evaluate and compare multiple policy scenarios. Heterogeneous autonomous agents interact under different policy regimes, and emergent system-level outcomes are compared across scenarios to inform evidence-based policy decisions. It is widely used in public health, urban planning, economics, and social policy research. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|