ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

Advocacy Coalition Framework×Policy Network Analysis×
المجالPublic PolicyPublic Policy
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة19931992
صاحب الطريقةPaul Sabatier & Hank Jenkins-SmithR. A. W. Rhodes & David Marsh (British school); broader governance-network tradition
النوعTheory of the policy processAnalysis of inter-organisational policy relationships
المصدر التأسيسيSabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN: 9780813316499Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.) (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN: 9780198278528
الأسماء البديلةACF, Sabatier-Jenkins-Smith Framework, Advocacy Coalition ApproachPolicy Networks, Governance Network Analysis, Policy Network Approach
ذات صلة44
الملخصThe Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a theory of the policy process developed by Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith from the late 1980s and consolidated in their 1993 volume Policy Change and Learning. It explains policy stability and change over long periods by analysing competing coalitions of actors within a policy subsystem who are bound together by shared beliefs. Policy change is understood as a function of the interaction among these belief-based coalitions, the policy-oriented learning that occurs over time, and external events and shocks that can shift the balance of power among them.Policy network analysis examines policymaking as the product of relationships among interdependent actors — government agencies, interest groups, experts and others — who exchange resources such as information, money, legitimacy and authority. In the influential British tradition associated with R. A. W. Rhodes and David Marsh, policy networks range along a continuum from tightly knit, exclusive 'policy communities' to loose, open 'issue networks', and the type of network is held to shape policy outcomes. More broadly, the approach applies the concepts and tools of social-network analysis to governance, treating the structure of ties among actors as a key explanatory variable.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 1 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Advocacy Coalition Framework · Policy Network Analysis. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-24 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare