Process / pipelineTourism RecreationTourist motivation and destination choicePipeline

Push-Pull Motivation Analysis

Also known as: Push and Pull Factors Analysis, Push-Pull Travel Motivation, Dann-Crompton Motivation Framework

OriginatorGraham M. S. Dann; John L. CromptonYear1979Sources2Related methods10

Push-pull motivation analysis is the dominant framework for explaining why people travel and why they choose particular destinations, by separating two distinct forces. Push factors are internal, socio-psychological motives that create the desire to travel in the first place, such as the wish to escape routine, relax, gain prestige, or enhance one's ego. Pull factors are external attributes of destinations that draw travelers toward a specific place, such as scenery, climate, culture, attractions, and events. Graham Dann introduced the push-pull logic in 1977, arguing that the answer to 'what makes tourists travel?' lies first in push factors like anomie and ego-enhancement, and John Crompton's 1979 study gave it empirical shape by identifying socio-psychological and cultural motives behind pleasure vacations. The analysis measures both sets of factors, recovers their underlying dimensions, and examines how internal motives connect to the destination attributes travelers seek.

Key highlights

  • Cleanly separates the impulse to travel from the choice of destination, capturing two distinct determinants in one framework.
  • Is theoretically grounded in Dann's and Crompton's foundational motivation research and widely validated across markets.
  • Links internal motives to destination attributes, explaining not just that people travel but what kind of place attracts them.
  • Produces motivation-based segments that are directly actionable for destination positioning and marketing.

Intuition

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

How it works

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

When to use it

Use push-pull motivation analysis when you want to explain both why people are motivated to travel and why they choose particular destinations, and to segment markets by motivation. It suits destination marketers and researchers who can survey travelers on both internal motives and destination attributes, and who want a well-established, theory-grounded structure for tourist motivation. The framework is particularly useful for matching destination positioning to the motives of target segments and for comparing the motivational profiles of different markets. It is less appropriate when only destination attributes or only internal motives can be measured, since the framework's value lies in linking the two, or when the research question concerns post-trip satisfaction rather than the motivation to travel, which is better addressed by expectancy-disconfirmation or HOLSAT methods.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Cleanly separates the impulse to travel from the choice of destination, capturing two distinct determinants in one framework.
  • Is theoretically grounded in Dann's and Crompton's foundational motivation research and widely validated across markets.
  • Links internal motives to destination attributes, explaining not just that people travel but what kind of place attracts them.
  • Produces motivation-based segments that are directly actionable for destination positioning and marketing.
Limitations
  • Push and pull factors are not always cleanly separable, since some motives blend internal desire with destination-specific appeal.
  • Self-reported motives are subject to social-desirability bias, especially for status- and ego-related items.
  • The factor structures of push and pull items can vary across cultures and samples, limiting comparability.
  • Most studies are cross-sectional and correlational, so the push-to-pull linkage is associational rather than causal.

Common pitfalls

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Applications

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Frequently asked

What is the difference between push and pull factors?

Push factors are internal, socio-psychological forces that create the desire to travel in the first place, such as the need to escape routine, to relax, to gain prestige, or to enhance one's ego. They explain the impulse to take a trip but not where to go. Pull factors are external attributes of destinations that attract an already-motivated traveler to a specific place, such as scenery, climate, culture, attractions, and cost. Dann argued that push factors come first, since they generate the wish to travel, while pull factors then determine destination choice. The framework's insight is that explaining tourist behavior requires both forces, not just one.

Why did Dann emphasize push factors like anomie and ego-enhancement?

Dann set out to answer the question of what makes tourists travel, and argued that the answer lies first in internal push factors rather than in the attractions of destinations. He highlighted two in particular: anomie, the sense of normlessness and isolation in modern everyday life that creates a longing to escape, and ego-enhancement, the desire for recognition and status that travel can satisfy. By foregrounding these socio-psychological needs, Dann shifted attention from where people go to why they want to go at all, establishing the push side as the starting point of motivation analysis that Crompton and later researchers then developed and measured.

How are push and pull factors measured and linked in practice?

Researchers survey travelers on the importance of a broad set of internal motive items, the push side, and a broad set of destination attribute items, the pull side. Factor analysis is applied to each set separately to recover coherent push dimensions, such as escape-relaxation and prestige, and pull dimensions, such as natural and cultural attractions. The two are then linked by estimating associations between the push and pull factors, revealing which internal motives go with which destination draws, for example escape motives aligning with relaxing natural settings. Travelers are often then segmented by their combined push and pull profiles for targeted marketing.

Sources

  1. 1.
    Crompton, J. L. (1979). Motivations for Pleasure Vacation. Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 408-424.
  2. 2.
    Dann, G. M. S. (1977). Anomie, Ego-Enhancement and Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 4(4), 184-194.

You have read it. What now?

Cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Push-Pull Motivation Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/tourism-recreation/push-pull-motivation-analysis