Rukia hadi maudhuiScholarGate
MaktabaMaktaba yanguDawatiReview StudioMsaidizi
Ingia
Unmatched Count Technique/Ushahidi
Rekodi ya ushahidi wa mbinu

Unmatched Count Technique

The unmatched count technique (also called the item count technique or list experiment) is an indirect survey method for estimating the prevalence of sensitive attitudes or behaviors while protecting respondents' privacy. Respondents are randomly assigned to one of two versions of a question. The control group sees a list of several non-sensitive items and reports only how many of them apply to them; the treatment group sees the same list plus one additional sensitive item and likewise reports only the count. Because respondents report a number rather than which items apply, no one's answer reveals their stance on the sensitive item. The estimated prevalence of the sensitive attribute is simply the difference in mean counts between the treatment and control groups. By breaking the link between an individual and the sensitive item, the technique reduces social-desirability bias for topics like prejudice, illegal behavior, or stigmatized attitudes, as documented in validation work by Holbrook and Krosnick.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Rekodi ya chanzo

Nukuu zimehamishwa kwa uhalisi kutoka kwa rekodi ya chanzo cha mbinu. Hakuna uthibitisho wa kiwango cha dai unaodokezwa kutoka kwao.

Unmatched Count Technique (Item Count / List Experiment)
Rekodi ya mbinu ya kiajenda · process-pipeline / social-psychology
  • Holbrook, A. L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2010). Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(1), 37-67. · DOI 10.1093/poq/nfp065
  • Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The 'false consensus effect': An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279-301. · DOI 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
Fungua mbinu kamili

Madai yaliyotunzwa

Madai yamehifadhiwa katika daftari la ushahidi, kila moja ikiwa na tathmini yake.

Hakuna madai yaliyotunzwa bado

Mwonekano huu haubuni tathmini ya dai wakati daftari haina yoyote.

Mbinu zinazohusiana

Zilizotengenezwa kutoka kwa grafu ya mbinu na kuonyeshwa kama uhusiano uliopendekezwa na mashine — hakuna dai la ushahidi linalodokezwa.

Same method familyBogus Pipelinemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyFalse Consensus Paradigmmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyLost Letter Techniquemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Hali ya ushahidi

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Vyanzo

2 nukuu zilizorekodiwa, ziliyonakiliwa kutoka kwa rekodi ya chanzo cha mbinu.

Vitendo

Fungua ukurasa wa mbinu
ScholarGate

Maktaba ya marejeleo inayotanguliza maudhui kwa mbinu za utafiti — kila moja ni nini, inavyofanya kazi, na inakotoka.

Data huria (CC-BY)

Gundua

  • Maktaba
  • Tafuta mbinu…
  • Vinjari kwa nyanja
  • Nyanja
  • Safari
  • Linganisha
  • Mbinu ipi?

Marejeo

  • Taaluma
  • Atlas
  • Kamusi ya istilahi
  • Mbinu
  • Falsafa

Eneo la kazi

  • Maktaba yangu
  • Dawati
  • Gumzo

Kampuni

  • Kuhusu
  • Bei
  • Wasiliana nasi
  • Pendekeza mbinu

Maingizo yamekusanywa kutoka vyanzo vilivyochapishwa kwa madhumuni ya marejeo. Kuthibitisha usahihi na ufaafu wa taarifa yoyote kwa matumizi yako mwenyewe kunabaki kuwa jukumu lako.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Maktaba ya marejeleo ya mbinu za utafiti
  • Faragha
  • Vidakuzi
  • Masharti
  • Futa akaunti