Metodbevispost

Democratic Norms Support Measurement

This approach measures how committed ordinary citizens are to democratic norms by observing the price they are willing to pay to uphold them. Rather than asking abstractly whether people value democracy, Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik's 2020 candidate-choice design confronts voters with a co-partisan candidate who violates a democratic principle and estimates how much electoral support that violation costs. Their finding that most Americans will tolerate undemocratic behavior by their own side when partisanship and policy stakes are high reframed the study of democratic backsliding around revealed, not professed, commitment. Christopher Claassen's parallel work links aggregate diffuse support for democracy to whether democracies survive.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Källpost

Citat kopierade ordagrant från metodens källpost. Ingen verifiering på källnivå härleds från dem.

Measuring Mass Support for Democratic Norms (Candidate-Choice Tradeoff Design)

Taxonomisk metodpost · process-pipeline / political-psychology

Öppna fullständig metod

Kuraterade påståenden

Påståenden lagrade i bevisloggen, var och en med sin egen bedömning.

Inga kuraterade påståenden ännu

Denna vy hittar inte på en påståendebedömning när loggen saknar en.

Relaterade metoder

Genererade från metodgrafen och visade som maskinföreslagna relationer – inga bevispåståenden härleds.

Same method familyElite Cue Experimentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPolitical Trust Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainSupport for Political Violence Measuremachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.