Запис о доказима методе

Social Identity Political Measurement

Social identity measurement in political behavior applies social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) to political groups, treating partisanship, ideology, or movement membership as a social identity rather than a mere instrumental affiliation. Huddy, Mason and Aaroe (2015) adapted Mael and Tetlock-style identity items into a partisan social-identity scale that measures expressive, emotionally charged group attachment and predicts campaign activity and political emotion better than issue agreement.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Изворни запис

Цитирани радови су копирани дословно из изворног записа методе. Из њих се не изводи верификација на нивоу тврдње.

Social Identity Measurement in Political Behavior

Таксономски запис методе · process-pipeline / political-psychology

Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1-17. · DOI 10.1017/S0003055414000604
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. · ISBN 9780818502781

Отвори пуну методу

Куроване тврдње

Тврдње су сачуване у регистру доказа, свака са својом проценом.

Још увек нема курованих тврдњи

Овај приказ не измишља процену тврдње када регистар нема ниједну.

Сродне методе

Генерисано из графа метода и приказано као машински предложене везе — не изводи се тврдња доказа.

Same method familyAffective Polarization Measurementmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGroup Identity Measurementmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyNational Identity Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPartisan Identity Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.