Запис о доказима методе

Occupational Gender Segregation Index

Occupational gender segregation indices measure how unevenly women and men are distributed across occupations. The most widely used is the Duncan and Duncan index of dissimilarity, introduced in 1955, which gives the share of women (or men) who would have to change occupations for the two distributions to match. Together with margin-free alternatives and decompositions into horizontal and vertical components, these indices are the standard tools for quantifying the sex segregation of labour markets.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Изворни запис

Цитирани радови су копирани дословно из изворног записа методе. Из њих се не изводи верификација на нивоу тврдње.

Occupational Gender Segregation Indices (Duncan Dissimilarity and Related Measures)

Таксономски запис методе · process-pipeline / gender-studies

Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review, 20(2), 210–217. · DOI 10.2307/2088328
Charles, M., & Grusky, D. B. (2004). Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford University Press. · ISBN 9780804748803
Blackburn, R. M., Jarman, J., & Brooks, B. (2000). The puzzle of gender segregation and inequality: A cross-national analysis. European Sociological Review, 16(2), 119–135. · DOI 10.1093/esr/16.2.119

Отвори пуну методу

Куроване тврдње

Тврдње су сачуване у регистру доказа, свака са својом проценом.

Још увек нема курованих тврдњи

Овај приказ не измишља процену тврдње када регистар нема ниједну.

Сродне методе

Генерисано из графа метода и приказано као машински предложене везе — не изводи се тврдња доказа.

Used in the same domainGender Gap Decompositionmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGender Parity Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketGlass Ceiling Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGlobal Gender Gap Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.