Пређи на садржајScholarGate
BibliotekaMoja bibliotekaСтоReview StudioAsistent
Prijavite se
New Economics of Labor Migration Test/Доказ
Запис о доказима методе

New Economics of Labor Migration Test

The new economics of labor migration (NELM), launched by Oded Stark and David Bloom in 1985, recasts migration as a decision made by households rather than isolated individuals and as a strategy aimed at managing risk and relative standing rather than simply maximizing one earner's wage. In the neoclassical view a worker migrates because expected earnings abroad exceed earnings at home; NELM argues instead that families in economies with missing or imperfect insurance and credit markets send a member away to diversify income sources and to relax the constraints those market failures impose. Stark and Taylor's 1991 paper added a second, distinctive motive: households migrate to reduce their relative deprivation — their position in the local income distribution — so that a family can be absolutely well-off yet still send a migrant because it feels poor relative to neighbors. Testing NELM therefore means estimating migration and remittance behavior as functions of household risk exposure and relative deprivation, not just the wage gap. Massey and colleagues' 1993 review positioned NELM as the principal theoretical rival to neoclassical migration economics. The test is fundamentally a household-level econometric exercise that pits these motives against the simple expected-income account.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Изворни запис

Цитирани радови су копирани дословно из изворног записа методе. Из њих се не изводи верификација на нивоу тврдње.

Testing the New Economics of Labor Migration (Relative Deprivation and Risk Diversification)
Таксономски запис методе · regression-model / migration-studies
  • Stark, O., & Bloom, D. E. (1985). The New Economics of Labor Migration. American Economic Review, 75(2), 173-178. · URL
  • Stark, O., & Taylor, J. E. (1991). Migration Incentives, Migration Types: The Role of Relative Deprivation. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1163-1178. · DOI 10.2307/2234433
  • Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431-466. · DOI 10.2307/2938462
Отвори пуну методу

Куроване тврдње

Тврдње су сачуване у регистру доказа, свака са својом проценом.

Још увек нема курованих тврдњи

Овај приказ не измишља процену тврдње када регистар нема ниједну.

Сродне методе

Генерисано из графа метода и приказано као машински предложене везе — не изводи се тврдња доказа.

Used in the same domainMigrant Network Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainPush-Pull Factor Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRemittance Impact Evaluationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Статус доказа

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Извори

3 забележена цитата, копирана из изворног записа методе.

Акције

Отвори страницу методе
ScholarGate

Referentna biblioteka istraživačkih metoda usmerena na sadržaj — šta je svaka metoda, kako funkcioniše i odakle potiče.

Otvoreni podaci (CC-BY)

Откриј

  • Biblioteka
  • Pretražite metode…
  • Pregled po oblastima
  • Oblasti
  • Put
  • Uporedi
  • Koja metoda?

Референца

  • Области
  • Атлас
  • Rečnik pojmova
  • Методологија
  • Филозофија

Радни простор

  • Moja biblioteka
  • Сто
  • Ћаскање

Компанија

  • O nama
  • Цене
  • Kontakt
  • Predložite metodu

Stavke su sastavljene iz objavljenih izvora radi referentne upotrebe. Provera tačnosti i prikladnosti svake informacije za vaše potrebe ostaje vaša odgovornost.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Referentna biblioteka istraživačkih metoda
  • Privatnost
  • Kolačići
  • Uslovi korišćenja
  • Избриши налог