Пређи на садржајScholarGate
BibliotekaMoja bibliotekaСтоReview StudioAsistent
Prijavite se
Crowding Norm Curve Analysis/Доказ
Запис о доказима методе

Crowding Norm Curve Analysis

Crowding norm curve analysis is a field-survey pipeline for measuring how crowded recreationists feel and for translating their evaluations of density into management standards. Its measurement backbone is the standard single-item 9-point crowding question introduced in Shelby and Heberlein's 1986 book Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings, on which visitors rate how crowded a setting felt from 'not at all crowded' (1-2) to 'extremely crowded' (8-9). Perceived crowding is a normative evaluation, not a raw density: it is the negative judgment people make about the number of people or encounters they experienced. Vaske and Shelby's 2008 synthesis of thirty years and more than 180 studies showed that this single item behaves consistently, that respondents scoring 3 or higher are conventionally classified as feeling crowded, and that several ways of summarizing the scale correlate above .90. Paired with acceptability evaluations of different densities, the method yields social norm curves that locate the use level at which conditions become unacceptable — a basis for capacity standards.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Изворни запис

Цитирани радови су копирани дословно из изворног записа методе. Из њих се не изводи верификација на нивоу тврдње.

Crowding Norm Curve Analysis (Perceived Crowding and Density-Acceptability Norms)
Таксономски запис методе · process-pipeline / sport-leisure-studies
  • Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press. · ISBN 9780870714269
  • Vaske, J. J., & Shelby, L. B. (2008). Crowding as a Descriptive Indicator and an Evaluative Standard: Results from 30 Years of Research. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 111-126. · DOI 10.1080/01490400701881341
Отвори пуну методу

Куроване тврдње

Тврдње су сачуване у регистру доказа, свака са својом проценом.

Још увек нема курованих тврдњи

Овај приказ не измишља процену тврдње када регистар нема ниједну.

Сродне методе

Генерисано из графа метода и приказано као машински предложене везе — не изводи се тврдња доказа.

Taxonomic bucketEncounter Norm Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Conflict and Coping Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Specialization Continuummachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Substitutability Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Статус доказа

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Извори

2 забележена цитата, копирана из изворног записа методе.

Акције

Отвори страницу методе
ScholarGate

Referentna biblioteka istraživačkih metoda usmerena na sadržaj — šta je svaka metoda, kako funkcioniše i odakle potiče.

Otvoreni podaci (CC-BY)

Откриј

  • Biblioteka
  • Pretražite metode…
  • Pregled po oblastima
  • Oblasti
  • Put
  • Uporedi
  • Koja metoda?

Референца

  • Области
  • Атлас
  • Rečnik pojmova
  • Методологија
  • Филозофија

Радни простор

  • Moja biblioteka
  • Сто
  • Ћаскање

Компанија

  • O nama
  • Цене
  • Kontakt
  • Predložite metodu

Stavke su sastavljene iz objavljenih izvora radi referentne upotrebe. Provera tačnosti i prikladnosti svake informacije za vaše potrebe ostaje vaša odgovornost.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Referentna biblioteka istraživačkih metoda
  • Privatnost
  • Kolačići
  • Uslovi korišćenja
  • Избриши налог