Latent structureSport Leisure StudiesLeisure psychology / adolescent motivationModel

Free Time Motivation Scale

Also known as: FTMS-A, Free Time Motivation Scale for Adolescents, Baldwin-Caldwell Free-Time Motivation Measure, Adolescent Free-Time Self-Determination Scale

OriginatorCheryl K. Baldwin & Linda L. CaldwellYear2003Sources2Related methods6

The Free Time Motivation Scale for Adolescents (FTMS-A), developed by Cheryl Baldwin and Linda Caldwell in 2003, is a self-report instrument that measures why young people do what they do in their free time, grounded in self-determination theory. Rather than asking only whether adolescents are motivated, it distinguishes five qualitatively different regulatory styles arranged along a continuum of self-determination: intrinsic motivation (free time pursued for its own enjoyment), identified regulation (valued as personally important), introjected regulation (driven by internal pressure such as guilt), external regulation (driven by outside rewards or demands), and amotivation (a lack of any clear reason to act). Each style is captured by a reflective latent subscale and validated through confirmatory factor analysis. Built on Ryan and Deci's self-determination framework and validated with young adolescents, the FTMS-A lets researchers locate where a young person's free-time motivation falls on the autonomy continuum and relate that profile to engagement, boredom, and well-being.

Key highlights

  • Measures the quality of free-time motivation across five self-determination regulatory styles rather than a single global motivation score.
  • Is explicitly grounded in self-determination theory and tested against the theory's predicted simplex ordering of regulatory styles.
  • Is purpose-built and validated for adolescents, filling a gap left by adult-oriented leisure-motivation measures.
  • Yields both a multidimensional profile and a summary self-determination index, supporting flexible analysis and intervention evaluation.

Intuition

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

How it works

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

When to use it

Use the Free Time Motivation Scale when you want to measure not just how motivated adolescents are in their free time but why, in self-determination terms, and to relate the quality of that motivation to outcomes like engagement, boredom, initiative, or risk behavior. It is well suited to youth-development and leisure-education research, to evaluating programs intended to foster more autonomous free-time motivation, and to studies that need to distinguish intrinsically engaged young people from those who are externally pressured or amotivated despite similar activity levels. It works when you can administer a Likert questionnaire to adolescents, typically ages twelve to fifteen, and have sample sizes adequate for confirmatory factor analysis. It is less appropriate for adults (for whom other self-determination leisure measures exist), for very young children, or when only a global motivation score is needed and the regulatory-style distinctions are not of interest.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Measures the quality of free-time motivation across five self-determination regulatory styles rather than a single global motivation score.
  • Is explicitly grounded in self-determination theory and tested against the theory's predicted simplex ordering of regulatory styles.
  • Is purpose-built and validated for adolescents, filling a gap left by adult-oriented leisure-motivation measures.
  • Yields both a multidimensional profile and a summary self-determination index, supporting flexible analysis and intervention evaluation.
Limitations
  • Original confirmatory factor analyses showed only minimally acceptable fit in places, so the five-factor structure can be fragile in adolescent samples.
  • Introjected and external regulation, and identified and intrinsic motivation, can be hard to separate empirically, blurring adjacent subscales.
  • As an adolescent self-report measure it depends on respondents' ability to introspect on their reasons, which varies with age and reading level.
  • It captures motivational orientation at one time and not how free-time motivation develops, so causal and developmental claims require longitudinal data.

Common pitfalls

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Applications

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Frequently asked

How is the FTMS-A different from the Leisure Motivation Scale?

The Leisure Motivation Scale, in the Beard and Ragheb tradition, measures the content of leisure motives, the intellectual, social, competence-mastery, and stimulus-avoidance reasons people seek leisure. The Free Time Motivation Scale instead measures the quality of motivation in self-determination terms, distinguishing intrinsic, identified, introjected, and external regulation and amotivation, regardless of which specific need the activity serves. In other words, one asks what people want from leisure and the other asks how self-determined their reason for doing it is. The FTMS-A is also purpose-built for adolescents. The two are complementary: a teen could be socially motivated (content) yet externally regulated (quality), and the scales capture different things.

What does the self-determination continuum mean in practice?

It means the five regulatory styles are not independent categories but an ordered sequence from controlled to autonomous. Amotivation (no real reason) and external regulation (outside pressure) sit at the controlled end; introjected regulation (internal pressure like guilt) is partially internalized; identified regulation (personal value) is more autonomous; and intrinsic motivation (inherent enjoyment) is fully self-determined. In practice this ordering predicts how the subscales relate, adjacent styles correlate more positively than distant ones, which is the simplex pattern used to validate the scale. It also guides interpretation: shifting a young person from external or introjected toward identified or intrinsic motivation is the developmental goal, because more autonomous motivation predicts better engagement and well-being.

Why measure free-time motivation in adolescents specifically?

Adolescence is when young people gain substantial discretionary time and begin choosing how to use it, and those choices shape development, identity, and risk. How self-determined adolescents are in their free time predicts whether that time fosters initiative, engagement, and well-being or slides into boredom, disengagement, and risky behavior. Adults and younger children differ in how they understand and regulate their motivation, so a measure validated specifically for young adolescents, as the FTMS-A is, captures the construct more accurately than a borrowed adult instrument. This makes it valuable for evaluating leisure-education and youth programs that aim to build the autonomous motivation associated with positive development.

Sources

  1. 1.
    Baldwin, C. K., & Caldwell, L. L. (2003). Development of the Free Time Motivation Scale for Adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(2), 129-151.
  2. 2.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

You have read it. What now?

Cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Free Time Motivation Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sport-leisure-studies/free-time-motivation-scale