Regression modelSpatial analysisModel

Moran's I Spatial Autocorrelation Test

Also known as: global Moran's I, spatial autocorrelation test, Moran's I Uzamsal Otokorelasyon Testi

OriginatorPatrick A. P. MoranYear1950Sources2Related methods7

Moran's I is a global statistic, introduced by Patrick Moran in 1950, that measures whether and how a continuous variable is spatially autocorrelated across mapped units. A positive value signals clustering of similar values, a negative value signals a dispersed (checkerboard) pattern, and it is most often used as a diagnostic before moving to spatial regression.

Key highlights

  • Provides a single, interpretable global index of spatial autocorrelation, analogous to a correlation coefficient.
  • Serves as a standard diagnostic step before choosing a spatial regression model.
  • Sign and magnitude directly distinguish clustering (positive) from dispersion (negative).

Intuition

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

How it works

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

When to use it

Use Moran's I when you have a continuous variable attached to spatial units with known geography and want a single global verdict on spatial autocorrelation, typically with at least about 30 observations. It requires a defined spatial weights matrix W (for example k-nearest-neighbour, queen, or rook contiguity), and row-standardisation of W is the default practice. The variable should be continuous; for binary variables a Join-Count test is preferred. It is the natural first diagnostic before fitting a spatial lag or spatial error model.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Provides a single, interpretable global index of spatial autocorrelation, analogous to a correlation coefficient.
  • Serves as a standard diagnostic step before choosing a spatial regression model.
  • Sign and magnitude directly distinguish clustering (positive) from dispersion (negative).
Limitations
  • Requires coordinate or geographic data; without it spatial autocorrelation cannot be computed and ordinary correlation should be used instead.
  • Results depend heavily on the chosen spatial weights matrix and its standardisation.
  • Being global, it reports one number for the whole map and can mask local hot or cold spots.

Common pitfalls

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Applications

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Frequently asked

What does a positive versus negative Moran's I mean?

A positive value indicates spatial clustering — similar values tend to sit near one another. A negative value indicates dispersion, where high and low values alternate across space. A value near the expected -1/(n-1) suggests no spatial pattern.

What is the spatial weights matrix W?

W encodes which units are neighbours and how strongly they connect, built from rules such as k-nearest-neighbour, queen, or rook contiguity. Row-standardising W (so each row sums to one) is the default, and the choice of W materially affects the result.

How is significance assessed?

The observed I is compared with its null expectation through a z-score, with the reference distribution obtained analytically or, more commonly, by random permutation of the values across the map.

When should I use LISA instead?

Moran's I is a global statistic, so it gives one number for the entire map. When you need to locate specific clusters or spatial outliers, use Local Moran's I (LISA), which computes a separate statistic for each unit.

Sources

  1. 1.
    Moran, P.A.P. (1950). Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1/2), 17–23.
  2. 2.
    Cliff, A.D. & Ord, J.K. (1981). Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. Pion.
    ISBN 978-0850860818

You have read it. What now?

Cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Moran's I. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/spatial-analysis/morans-i-test

Moran's I Spatial Autocorrelation Test | ScholarGate