Záznam dôkazov metódy

Social Identity Political Measurement

Social identity measurement in political behavior applies social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) to political groups, treating partisanship, ideology, or movement membership as a social identity rather than a mere instrumental affiliation. Huddy, Mason and Aaroe (2015) adapted Mael and Tetlock-style identity items into a partisan social-identity scale that measures expressive, emotionally charged group attachment and predicts campaign activity and political emotion better than issue agreement.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Zdrojový záznam

Citácie skopírované doslovne zo zdrojového záznamu metódy. Nevyplýva z nich žiadne overenie na úrovni tvrdenia.

Social Identity Measurement in Political Behavior

Taxonomický záznam metódy · process-pipeline / political-psychology

Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1-17. · DOI 10.1017/S0003055414000604
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. · ISBN 9780818502781

Otvoriť celú metódu

Spracované tvrdenia

Tvrdenia uložené v registri dôkazov, každé s vlastným hodnotením.

Zatiaľ žiadne spracované tvrdenia

Tento pohľad nevymýšľa hodnotenie tvrdenia, ak register žiadne nemá.

Súvisiace metódy

Vygenerované z grafu metód a zobrazené ako vzťahy navrhnuté strojom – nevyplýva z nich žiadne tvrdenie o dôkaze.

Same method familyAffective Polarization Measurementmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGroup Identity Measurementmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyNational Identity Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPartisan Identity Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.