Environmental Justice Spatial Analysis
Environmental justice spatial analysis tests whether environmentally hazardous facilities are located disproportionately near poor and minority communities by comparing the demographics of populations close to hazards with those farther away. The field grew out of Robert Bullard's foundational documentation in Dumping in Dixie that African American communities in the U.S. South systematically bore the burden of noxious land uses. A central methodological turning point came with Paul Mohai and Robin Saha's 2006 Demography article, which showed that the long-dominant 'unit-hazard coincidence' method, comparing only the host tract or zip code, badly understated disparities, and that distance-based methods reveal larger and more consistent inequities. The modern analysis therefore treats proximity explicitly, drawing buffers or distance bands around hazard sites and apportioning population within them. It then asks whether race and income predict who lives in the burdened zone, controlling for plausible confounders. The result is a spatially explicit test of the disparate-burden hypothesis at the heart of the environmental justice movement.
Исходная запись
Цитирование скопировано дословно из исходной записи метода. На его основании не делается никаких выводов о проверке на уровне утверждения.
- Mohai, P., & Saha, R. (2006). Reassessing Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Environmental Justice Research. Demography, 43(2), 383-399. · DOI 10.1353/dem.2006.0017
- Bullard, R. D. (2000). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. · ISBN 9780813367927
Курируемые утверждения
Утверждения сохранены в реестре доказательств, каждое со своей оценкой.
Этот вид не создает оценку утверждения, если в реестре ее нет.
Связанные методы
Сгенерировано из графа методов и показано как предложенные машиной связи — никаких выводов об утверждениях доказательств не делается.