Înregistrare dovezi metodologice

God Image Measurement

God image measurement quantifies the emotional, relational picture a believer holds of God — not the doctrines they affirm, but how they experience the divine as, say, loving or wrathful, accepting or rejecting, near or distant, controlling or permissive. Peter Benson and Bernard Spilka's 1973 study established the empirical approach: they measured the God image along evaluative dimensions and showed that it is systematically tied to the self, with people higher in self-esteem and internal locus of control picturing a more loving and accepting God. The tradition distinguishes the God image (the affect-laden, experienced representation) from the God concept (the formally professed theological description) and measures the former as a multidimensional latent construct from ratings of attributed divine characteristics.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Înregistrare sursă

Citările sunt copiate integral din înregistrarea sursă a metodei. Nu se inferă nicio verificare la nivel de afirmație din acestea.

God Image / God Concept Measurement (Loving and Controlling God Representations)

Înregistrare metodologică taxonomică · latent-structure / religious-studies

Benson, P., & Spilka, B. (1973). God image as a function of self-esteem and locus of control. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 12(3), 297-310. · DOI 10.2307/1384430

Deschide metoda completă

Afirmații curate

Afirmațiile sunt stocate în registrul dovezilor, fiecare cu propria evaluare.

Încă nu există afirmații curate

Această vizualizare nu inventează o evaluare a afirmației dacă registrul nu conține una.

Metode conexe

Generate din graful metodelor și afișate ca relații sugerate automat — nu se inferă nicio afirmație de dovadă.

Same method familyCentrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketReligious Doubt Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketReligious Orientation Scale (ROS)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.