Synthetic Control for Health Policy
The synthetic control method evaluates the effect of a population-health policy implemented in a single aggregate unit — a state, country, or region — by building a data-driven comparator from a pool of untreated units. When a policy such as a tobacco tax, an alcohol-pricing law, a smoking ban, or a health-insurance expansion is enacted in one place, no single other place is a perfect counterfactual. The method instead forms a synthetic version of the treated unit as a weighted average of donor units chosen so that the synthetic closely tracks the treated unit's outcome and predictors before the policy. The post-intervention gap between the real unit and its synthetic twin estimates the policy's effect. Introduced by Abadie and Gardeazabal and formalized by Abadie, Diamond and Hainmueller — whose canonical application is California's Proposition 99 tobacco-control program — it has become a leading design for evaluating health policies at the population level, with placebo tests providing inference.
Registro de origem
Citações copiadas literalmente do registro de origem do método. Nenhuma verificação em nível de alegação é inferida delas.
- Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132. · DOI 10.1257/000282803321455188
- Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. · DOI 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746
Alegações curadas
Alegações persistidas no livro-razão de evidências, cada uma com sua própria avaliação.
Esta visualização não inventa uma avaliação de alegação quando o livro-razão não a possui.
Métodos relacionados
Gerado a partir do grafo de métodos e mostrado como relações sugeridas por máquina — nenhuma alegação de evidência é inferida.