Cortex Ratio Analysis
Cortex ratio analysis is a quantitative method for assessing whether a lithic assemblage represents the complete reduction of the stone present, or whether pieces have been carried into or out of the deposit. Its insight is that every stone nodule begins entirely covered by a weathered outer rind, or cortex, and that knapping progressively removes this cortex as flakes are struck; a complete, undisturbed reduction event should therefore retain a predictable amount of cortical surface relative to the volume of stone it contains. By measuring the cortical surface area actually observed across all artifacts and dividing it by the cortical surface area expected from the assemblage's total volume, Douglass and colleagues derived a single index — the cortex ratio — that diagnoses assemblage completeness. A ratio near one indicates an intact assemblage, less than one indicates that cortical pieces were removed, and more than one indicates that cortical material was imported. Building on the macroscopic measurement conventions Andrefsky systematizes, the method turns cortex from a qualitative stage indicator into a rigorous test of artifact transport and site formation.
Registro de origem
Citações copiadas literalmente do registro de origem do método. Nenhuma verificação em nível de alegação é inferida delas.
- Douglass, M. J., Holdaway, S. J., Fanning, P. C., & Shiner, J. I. (2008). An Assessment and Archaeological Application of Cortex Measurement in Lithic Assemblages. American Antiquity, 73(3), 513-526. · DOI 10.1017/S0002731600046849
- Andrefsky, W. (2005). Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. · ISBN 9780521615006
Alegações curadas
Alegações persistidas no livro-razão de evidências, cada uma com sua própria avaliação.
Esta visualização não inventa uma avaliação de alegação quando o livro-razão não a possui.
Métodos relacionados
Gerado a partir do grafo de métodos e mostrado como relações sugeridas por máquina — nenhuma alegação de evidência é inferida.