Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
ZMET (Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique)/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

ZMET (Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique)

The Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (ZMET) is a qualitative consumer-research method that uses images and metaphor to surface the deep, often non-conscious thoughts and feelings that drive how people relate to a brand, product, or experience. Developed by Gerald Zaltman and applied with Robin Higie Coulter, it rests on the premises that most communication is non-verbal, that thought is image-based and metaphorical, and that much of what shapes behavior lies below conscious awareness. Participants gather their own pictures representing their feelings about a topic before a lengthy depth interview, in which a trained interviewer probes the stories behind the images to move from surface metaphors to a small set of universal deep metaphors such as balance, transformation, connection, and journey. Across participants, the elicited constructs and their connections are combined into a consensus map of the shared mental model. Zaltman's 2003 book How Customers Think and the 1995 Journal of Advertising Research article with Coulter set out the technique and its rationale. ZMET aims to hear the voice of the customer in the visual, metaphorical terms in which people actually think.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (Image-Based Deep-Metaphor Research)
Taksonomisk metoderegister · process-pipeline / marketing
  • Zaltman, G. (2003). How Customers Think: Essential Insights into the Mind of the Market. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. · ISBN 9781578518265
  • Zaltman, G., & Coulter, R. H. (1995). Seeing the Voice of the Customer: Metaphor-Based Advertising Research. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(4), 35-51. · DOI 10.1080/00218499.1995.12466477
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Taxonomic bucketMeans-End Chain Ladderingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyNeuromarketing with EEGmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketProjective Techniques in Consumer Researchmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

2 registrerte siteringer, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto