Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data

The percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) is a simple nonoverlap effect-size index for single-case (single-subject) research, introduced by Scruggs, Mastropieri, and Casto in 1987 to enable quantitative synthesis of studies that report data graphically rather than as group statistics. PND quantifies how strongly an intervention shifted a behavior by computing the percentage of intervention-phase data points that exceed the single most extreme baseline data point in the direction of desired change. Because it requires only the graphed data and a ruler, PND became one of the most widely used effect sizes in meta-analyses of single-case research in special education, rehabilitation, and behavior analysis. Its very simplicity, however, brings well-documented weaknesses — a ceiling at 100 percent, extreme sensitivity to a single outlying baseline point, and blindness to trend — which motivated later nonoverlap-plus-trend indices such as Parker and colleagues' 2011 Tau-U. PND is best understood as a fast, interpretable, but coarse first look at single-case effect magnitude.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data (PND Nonoverlap Effect-Size Index for Single-Case Research)
Taksonomisk metoderegister · process-pipeline / disability-studies
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24-33. · DOI 10.1177/074193258700800206
  • Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284-299. · DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Same method familyAlternating Treatments Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyChanging Criterion Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySingle-Case Experimental Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

2 registrerte siteringer, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto