Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
Grip Strength Assessment/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

Grip Strength Assessment

Grip strength assessment measures the maximal isometric force a person can generate by squeezing a handheld dynamometer, providing a simple, objective marker of overall muscle strength. Although the test uses only the hand, grip strength correlates with strength elsewhere in the body and serves as a convenient proxy for total muscle function, which is why it is central to the assessment of sarcopenia and frailty. Roberts and colleagues' 2011 review in Age and Ageing synthesized how grip strength is measured across clinical and epidemiological studies and proposed a standardized approach, because variation in equipment, posture, and protocol had made results hard to compare. A standard protocol specifies a seated posture with the elbow flexed at ninety degrees, the use of a calibrated dynamometer such as the Jamar or Smedley, and recording the best of several maximal efforts. Low grip strength predicts a range of adverse outcomes — disability, longer hospital stays, slower recovery, multimorbidity, and mortality — independent of age and body size. Its speed, low cost, and strong prognostic value have made it a routine component of geriatric and population health assessment.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

Grip Strength Assessment (Handgrip Dynamometry of Muscle Strength)
Taksonomisk metoderegister · process-pipeline / social-gerontology
  • Roberts, H. C., Denison, H. J., Martin, H. J., Patel, H. P., Syddall, H., Cooper, C., & Sayer, A. A. (2011). A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age and Ageing, 40(4), 423-429. · DOI 10.1093/ageing/afr051
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Same method familyFried Frailty Phenotypemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGait Speed Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySPPBmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

1 registrert sitering, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto