Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
Global Deterioration Scale/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

Global Deterioration Scale

The Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) is a seven-stage clinical staging instrument that locates an older adult along the continuum of cognitive decline, from no impairment through very severe dementia. Introduced by Barry Reisberg and colleagues in 1982, it was designed to give clinicians and researchers a shared, ordinally graded vocabulary for the natural history of primary degenerative dementia, most prominently Alzheimer's disease. Rather than producing a numeric test score, the GDS asks the assessor to match a patient's cognitive, functional, and behavioral picture — gathered through clinical interview and informant report — to one of seven prototypical stage descriptions. Stages 1 to 3 cover the spectrum from normal cognition through subjective and then mild objective decline, stage 4 marks the threshold of clinically diagnosable dementia, and stages 5 to 7 trace the progression through moderate, moderately severe, and severe disease toward total dependence. Because the stages are ordered and clinically anchored, the GDS supports tracking decline over time, communicating prognosis, and stratifying patients in trials and care planning. It remains one of the most widely used global staging tools in gerontology and is often paired with the companion FAST and BCRS instruments from the same group.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

Global Deterioration Scale for Assessment of Primary Degenerative Dementia (Reisberg GDS)
Taksonomisk metoderegister · latent-structure / social-gerontology
  • Reisberg, B., Ferris, S. H., de Leon, M. J., & Crook, T. (1982). The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139(9), 1136-1139. · DOI 10.1176/ajp.139.9.1136
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Used in the same domainComprehensive Geriatric Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainFried Frailty Phenotypemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.See alsoTICSmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

1 registrert sitering, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto