Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
Cortex Ratio Analysis/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

Cortex Ratio Analysis

Cortex ratio analysis is a quantitative method for assessing whether a lithic assemblage represents the complete reduction of the stone present, or whether pieces have been carried into or out of the deposit. Its insight is that every stone nodule begins entirely covered by a weathered outer rind, or cortex, and that knapping progressively removes this cortex as flakes are struck; a complete, undisturbed reduction event should therefore retain a predictable amount of cortical surface relative to the volume of stone it contains. By measuring the cortical surface area actually observed across all artifacts and dividing it by the cortical surface area expected from the assemblage's total volume, Douglass and colleagues derived a single index — the cortex ratio — that diagnoses assemblage completeness. A ratio near one indicates an intact assemblage, less than one indicates that cortical pieces were removed, and more than one indicates that cortical material was imported. Building on the macroscopic measurement conventions Andrefsky systematizes, the method turns cortex from a qualitative stage indicator into a rigorous test of artifact transport and site formation.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

Cortex Ratio Analysis (Observed-to-Expected Cortical Surface Area for Assemblage Completeness)
Taksonomisk metoderegister · process-pipeline / archaeology
  • Douglass, M. J., Holdaway, S. J., Fanning, P. C., & Shiner, J. I. (2008). An Assessment and Archaeological Application of Cortex Measurement in Lithic Assemblages. American Antiquity, 73(3), 513-526. · DOI 10.1017/S0002731600046849
  • Andrefsky, W. (2005). Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. · ISBN 9780521615006
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Same method familyChaine Operatoiremachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyDebitage Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

2 registrerte siteringer, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto