Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
Besag-York-Mollie Model/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

Besag-York-Mollie Model

The Besag-York-Mollie (BYM) model is the workhorse hierarchical Bayesian model for small-area disease mapping. Proposed by Julian Besag, Jeremy York, and Annie Mollie (1991), it models area-level disease counts with a Poisson likelihood whose log relative risk is the sum of two random effects: a spatially structured component, given an intrinsic conditional autoregressive (ICAR) prior that borrows strength from neighboring areas, and an unstructured component capturing area-specific heterogeneity that is not spatially patterned. This convolution of structured and unstructured effects lets the model smooth noisy small-area rates toward local and global means while distinguishing genuine spatial trend from independent overdispersion. Because the original parameterization makes the two variance components hard to interpret and depends on the graph, Riebler, Sorbye, Simpson, and Rue (2016) introduced the scaled BYM2 reparameterization, which mixes a scaled spatial effect and an unstructured effect through a single interpretable mixing parameter and a total-variance parameter, improving prior specification and identifiability.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

Besag-York-Mollie (BYM) Convolution Model: Spatial CAR plus Unstructured Random Effects
Taksonomisk metoderegister · regression-model / spatial-epidemiology
  • Besag, J., York, J., & Mollie, A. (1991). Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43(1), 1-20. · DOI 10.1007/BF00116466
  • Riebler, A., Sorbye, S. H., Simpson, D., & Rue, H. (2016). An intuitive Bayesian spatial model for disease mapping that accounts for scaling. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 25(4), 1145-1165. · DOI 10.1177/0962280216660421
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Often confused withDisease Mappingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPoisson Rate Regressionmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySmall-Area Health Estimationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Often confused withSpatial Scan Statisticmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

2 registrerte siteringer, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto