Methodenbewijsdossier

Visioning Preferred Futures Workshop

A Visioning Preferred Futures Workshop is a normative, participatory futures method for articulating a shared image of the future a group wants to create, and then working backward from that image to identify the pathway and the present actions that would bring it about. Where exploratory methods ask what futures might happen, visioning asks what future ought to happen and how to get there. Documented as a core technique in the Millennium Project's Futures Research Methodology, it combines aspirational image-building with backcasting: participants first agree on a compelling preferred future grounded in their shared values, then trace the milestones backward from that future to the present, and finally commit to concrete first steps. The method's power lies in mobilizing a community around a positive, jointly owned vision rather than around forecasts or fears.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bronrecord

Citaten letterlijk overgenomen uit het bronrecord van de methode. Hieruit wordt geen verificatie op claimniveau afgeleid.

Visioning Preferred Futures Workshop (Normative Backcasting from a Shared Aspiration)

Taxonomisch methodendossier · process-pipeline / futures-foresight-studies

Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (Eds.). (2009). Futures Research Methodology, Version 3.0. The Millennium Project. · ISBN 9780981894119

Volledige methode openen

Gecureerde claims

Claims opgeslagen in het bewijsregister, elk met zijn eigen beoordeling.

Nog geen gecureerde claims

Deze weergave verzint geen claimbeoordeling als het register er geen heeft.

Gerelateerde methoden

Gegenereerd uit de methodegraaf en getoond als machinaal voorgestelde relaties — er wordt geen bewijsclaim afgeleid.

Same method familyCausal Layered Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyManoa Alternative Futures Methodmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyThree Horizons Frameworkmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.