Langkau ke kandunganScholarGate
PerpustakaanPerpustakaan sayaMejaReview StudioPembantu
Log masuk
Team Faultline Measurement/Bukti
Rekod bukti kaedah

Team Faultline Measurement

Team faultline measurement quantifies the hypothetical dividing lines that can split a work group into relatively homogeneous subgroups based on the alignment of several member attributes at once. Dora Lau and Keith Murnighan introduced the faultline concept in 1998, arguing that what matters is not how diverse a group is on any single attribute but how strongly multiple attributes line up to create a clean cleavage — for example, when all the older members are also the men and the engineers, while all the younger members are the women and the marketers. Thatcher, Jehn, and Zanutto operationalized the idea in 2003 with the Fau index of faultline strength and a companion measure of faultline distance, and tested their effects on conflict and performance. Later work by Meyer and Glenz compared the proliferating measures and proposed an average-silhouette-width approach that can handle more than two subgroups. The method turns an intuition about subgroup splits into a reproducible number that can be entered into models of team process and outcomes.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Rekod sumber

Petikan disalin secara verbatim daripada rekod sumber kaedah. Tiada pengesahan peringkat tuntutan disimpulkan daripadanya.

Team Faultline Measurement (Hypothetical Dividing Lines in Work Group Composition)
Rekod kaedah taksonomik · process-pipeline / organizational-behavior
  • Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325-340. · DOI 10.5465/amr.1998.533229
  • Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(3), 217-241. · DOI 10.1023/A:1023325406946
  • Meyer, B., & Glenz, A. (2013). Team faultline measures: A computational comparison and a new approach to multiple subgroups. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 393-424. · DOI 10.1177/1094428113484970
Buka kaedah penuh

Tuntutan yang dikurasi

Tuntutan disimpan dalam lejar bukti, setiap satu dengan penilaiannya sendiri.

Tiada tuntutan terkurasi lagi

Pandangan ini tidak mencipta penilaian tuntutan apabila lejar tiada.

Kaedah berkaitan

Dijana daripada graf kaedah dan ditunjukkan sebagai perhubungan yang dicadangkan mesin — tiada tuntutan bukti disimpulkan.

Same method familyMultitrait-Multimethod Matrixmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyOrganizational Network Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainPsychological Empowerment Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Status bukti

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sumber

3 petikan direkodkan, disalin daripada rekod sumber kaedah.

Tindakan

Buka halaman kaedah
ScholarGate

Perpustakaan rujukan berteraskan kandungan untuk kaedah penyelidikan — apakah setiap kaedah, bagaimana ia berfungsi, dan dari mana asalnya.

Data terbuka (CC-BY)

Terokai

  • Perpustakaan
  • Cari kaedah…
  • Layari mengikut bidang
  • Bidang
  • Perjalanan
  • Bandingkan
  • Kaedah yang mana?

Rujukan

  • Bidang
  • Atlas
  • Glosari
  • Metodologi
  • Falsafah

Ruang kerja

  • Perpustakaan saya
  • Meja
  • Sembang

Syarikat

  • Perihal
  • Harga
  • Hubungi
  • Cadangkan kaedah

Entri disusun daripada sumber yang diterbitkan untuk rujukan. Pengesahan ketepatan dan kesesuaian sebarang maklumat untuk kegunaan anda sendiri kekal menjadi tanggungjawab anda.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Perpustakaan rujukan kaedah penyelidikan
  • Privasi
  • Kuki
Terma
  • Padam akaun