Langkau ke kandunganScholarGate
PerpustakaanPerpustakaan sayaMejaReview StudioPembantu
Log masuk
Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data/Bukti
Rekod bukti kaedah

Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data

The percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) is a simple nonoverlap effect-size index for single-case (single-subject) research, introduced by Scruggs, Mastropieri, and Casto in 1987 to enable quantitative synthesis of studies that report data graphically rather than as group statistics. PND quantifies how strongly an intervention shifted a behavior by computing the percentage of intervention-phase data points that exceed the single most extreme baseline data point in the direction of desired change. Because it requires only the graphed data and a ruler, PND became one of the most widely used effect sizes in meta-analyses of single-case research in special education, rehabilitation, and behavior analysis. Its very simplicity, however, brings well-documented weaknesses — a ceiling at 100 percent, extreme sensitivity to a single outlying baseline point, and blindness to trend — which motivated later nonoverlap-plus-trend indices such as Parker and colleagues' 2011 Tau-U. PND is best understood as a fast, interpretable, but coarse first look at single-case effect magnitude.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Rekod sumber

Petikan disalin secara verbatim daripada rekod sumber kaedah. Tiada pengesahan peringkat tuntutan disimpulkan daripadanya.

Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data (PND Nonoverlap Effect-Size Index for Single-Case Research)
Rekod kaedah taksonomik · process-pipeline / disability-studies
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24-33. · DOI 10.1177/074193258700800206
  • Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284-299. · DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
Buka kaedah penuh

Tuntutan yang dikurasi

Tuntutan disimpan dalam lejar bukti, setiap satu dengan penilaiannya sendiri.

Tiada tuntutan terkurasi lagi

Pandangan ini tidak mencipta penilaian tuntutan apabila lejar tiada.

Kaedah berkaitan

Dijana daripada graf kaedah dan ditunjukkan sebagai perhubungan yang dicadangkan mesin — tiada tuntutan bukti disimpulkan.

Same method familyAlternating Treatments Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyChanging Criterion Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySingle-Case Experimental Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Status bukti

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sumber

2 petikan direkodkan, disalin daripada rekod sumber kaedah.

Tindakan

Buka halaman kaedah
ScholarGate

Perpustakaan rujukan berteraskan kandungan untuk kaedah penyelidikan — apakah setiap kaedah, bagaimana ia berfungsi, dan dari mana asalnya.

Data terbuka (CC-BY)

Terokai

  • Perpustakaan
  • Cari kaedah…
  • Layari mengikut bidang
  • Bidang
  • Perjalanan
  • Bandingkan
  • Kaedah yang mana?

Rujukan

  • Bidang
  • Atlas
  • Glosari
  • Metodologi
  • Falsafah

Ruang kerja

  • Perpustakaan saya
  • Meja
  • Sembang

Syarikat

  • Perihal
  • Harga
  • Hubungi
  • Cadangkan kaedah

Entri disusun daripada sumber yang diterbitkan untuk rujukan. Pengesahan ketepatan dan kesesuaian sebarang maklumat untuk kegunaan anda sendiri kekal menjadi tanggungjawab anda.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Perpustakaan rujukan kaedah penyelidikan
  • Privasi
  • Kuki
Terma
  • Padam akaun