Langkau ke kandunganScholarGate
PerpustakaanPerpustakaan sayaMejaReview StudioPembantu
Log masuk
Attitude-Behavior-Context Model (ABC)/Bukti
Rekod bukti kaedah

Attitude-Behavior-Context Model (ABC)

The attitude-behavior-context (ABC) framework explains environmentally significant behavior as the joint product of internal attitudes and external contextual conditions, and crucially as their interaction rather than their sum. Gregory Guagnano, Paul Stern, and Thomas Dietz proposed it in 1995 using a natural experiment on curbside recycling, and Stern incorporated it into his 2000 theory of environmentally significant behavior. The core claim is that attitudes most strongly drive behavior when external conditions are neutral — neither strongly enabling nor strongly blocking the action — and that when context is overwhelmingly favorable or prohibitive, behavior is determined by the context regardless of attitude. Providing recycling bins, for example, raises recycling so much that pro-environmental attitudes add little, while in the absence of any collection even strong attitudes cannot produce the behavior. The framework reconciles the often weak and inconsistent attitude-behavior correlations in environmental research by treating context as a moderator. It is typically estimated as an interaction regression and complements value-belief-norm theory.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Rekod sumber

Petikan disalin secara verbatim daripada rekod sumber kaedah. Tiada pengesahan peringkat tuntutan disimpulkan daripadanya.

Attitude-Behavior-Context (ABC) Framework for Environmentally Significant Behavior
Rekod kaedah taksonomik · regression-model / environmental-sociology
  • Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27(5), 699-718. · DOI 10.1177/0013916595275005
  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. · DOI 10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Buka kaedah penuh

Tuntutan yang dikurasi

Tuntutan disimpan dalam lejar bukti, setiap satu dengan penilaiannya sendiri.

Tiada tuntutan terkurasi lagi

Pandangan ini tidak mencipta penilaian tuntutan apabila lejar tiada.

Kaedah berkaitan

Dijana daripada graf kaedah dan ditunjukkan sebagai perhubungan yang dicadangkan mesin — tiada tuntutan bukti disimpulkan.

Used in the same domainNew Ecological Paradigm Scale (NEP)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainSocial Practice Theory Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketValue-Belief-Norm Model (VBN)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Status bukti

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sumber

2 petikan direkodkan, disalin daripada rekod sumber kaedah.

Tindakan

Buka halaman kaedah
ScholarGate

Perpustakaan rujukan berteraskan kandungan untuk kaedah penyelidikan — apakah setiap kaedah, bagaimana ia berfungsi, dan dari mana asalnya.

Data terbuka (CC-BY)

Terokai

  • Perpustakaan
  • Cari kaedah…
  • Layari mengikut bidang
  • Bidang
  • Perjalanan
  • Bandingkan
  • Kaedah yang mana?

Rujukan

  • Bidang
  • Atlas
  • Glosari
  • Metodologi
  • Falsafah

Ruang kerja

  • Perpustakaan saya
  • Meja
  • Sembang

Syarikat

  • Perihal
  • Harga
  • Hubungi
  • Cadangkan kaedah

Entri disusun daripada sumber yang diterbitkan untuk rujukan. Pengesahan ketepatan dan kesesuaian sebarang maklumat untuk kegunaan anda sendiri kekal menjadi tanggungjawab anda.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Perpustakaan rujukan kaedah penyelidikan
  • Privasi
  • Kuki
Terma
  • Padam akaun