Process / pipelineMarketing ResearchConjoint analysis / market simulationPipeline

Conjoint Market Simulator

Also known as: Choice Simulator, Share-of-Preference Simulator, Market Simulation, Randomized First Choice Simulator

OriginatorSawtooth Software (Bryan Orme, Joel Huber); random utility choice theoryYear1999Sources3Related methods8

A conjoint market simulator turns the part-worth utilities estimated from a conjoint or discrete-choice study into predicted shares of preference for a set of competing products, letting analysts run 'what if' experiments on product design and pricing. Once each respondent's utilities are known, any product configuration can be scored, and a choice rule converts those scores into the probability that each respondent prefers each product; averaging across respondents gives the simulated market share. Practitioners choose among several rules: the first-choice rule assigns each respondent wholly to their highest-utility product, the share-of-preference rule uses the logit equation to spread probability across products, and the randomized first-choice rule, developed by Sawtooth Software, blends the two and adds attribute-level error to produce realistic substitution. Because the simulator runs on individual-level utilities, it reproduces heterogeneity and competitive interaction that aggregate models miss. The simulator is where conjoint delivers managerial value, supporting line optimization, pricing, cannibalization analysis, and competitive response. It is a simulation, however, predicting relative shares rather than absolute sales.

Key highlights

  • Translates abstract part-worth utilities into actionable predicted shares for any product configuration.
  • Runs on individual-level utilities, capturing heterogeneity and realistic competitive substitution.
  • Supports rich 'what if' analysis, pricing, line optimization, cannibalization, and competitive response, in a fast sandbox.
  • Offers choice rules (first choice, share of preference, randomized first choice) to balance volatility against realism.

Intuition

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

How it works

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

When to use it

Use a conjoint market simulator whenever you have estimated individual-level utilities from a conjoint or discrete-choice study and need to predict how preference shares would respond to product, pricing, or competitive changes. It is the right tool for line optimization, pricing decisions, feature trade-offs, cannibalization analysis, and competitive war-gaming, anything framed as a 'what if we changed the product or its price' question. The simulator is only as good as the underlying utilities, so it is inappropriate without a sound conjoint study, and it predicts relative shares of preference, not absolute volumes, so it should not be read as a literal sales forecast without external calibration. Choosing the appropriate choice rule, and validating against holdouts, is essential for credible use.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Translates abstract part-worth utilities into actionable predicted shares for any product configuration.
  • Runs on individual-level utilities, capturing heterogeneity and realistic competitive substitution.
  • Supports rich 'what if' analysis, pricing, line optimization, cannibalization, and competitive response, in a fast sandbox.
  • Offers choice rules (first choice, share of preference, randomized first choice) to balance volatility against realism.
Limitations
  • Predicts relative shares of preference, not absolute sales volumes, without external calibration.
  • Accuracy is bounded by the quality of the underlying conjoint utilities and the realism of the study design.
  • The share-of-preference logit rule can overstate the combined share of similar products via the independence-of-irrelevant-alternatives problem.
  • Results depend on the chosen choice rule and its tuning, so different settings can yield materially different shares.

Common pitfalls

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Applications

This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro

Frequently asked

What is the difference between first choice and share of preference?

First choice (maximum utility) assigns each respondent entirely to their single highest-utility product, so a product's share is the fraction of respondents who rank it best; it is intuitive and free of the independence-of-irrelevant-alternatives problem but volatile and unrealistic, since people do not always buy only their favorite. Share of preference instead uses the logit equation to give each product a probability proportional to its exponentiated utility, producing smoother, less volatile shares that reflect divided patronage. The trade-off is that share of preference can overstate similar products' combined share, which is exactly the gap that randomized first choice was designed to close.

Why is randomized first choice usually recommended?

Randomized first choice (RFC) blends the realism of first choice with the smoothness of share of preference by adding random error to the utilities, including at the attribute level, and averaging many first-choice simulations. The attribute-level error is the crucial ingredient: it makes near-identical products correctly cannibalize each other rather than draw share proportionally from all alternatives, which fixes the independence-of-irrelevant-alternatives distortion that plagues plain logit. According to Sawtooth's simulator documentation, RFC has been shown to predict holdout choice shares better than the other Sawtooth rules, which is why it is the recommended default for most simulations.

Can the simulator predict actual sales?

Not directly. A conjoint market simulator outputs shares of preference, the relative probability that respondents prefer each product within the defined competitive set, not absolute sales volumes. Real sales depend on awareness, distribution, the size and definition of the market, and factors the conjoint study never measured. Practitioners therefore use the simulator for relative comparisons across scenarios and, when an absolute forecast is needed, calibrate the simulated shares against known market data, adjust for the 'none' option and reach, and treat the result as a directional estimate. Holdout validation and external calibration are what bridge the gap between preference share and a usable sales forecast.

Sources

  1. 1.
    Orme, B. K. (2020). Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research (4th ed.). Madison, WI: Research Publishers LLC.
    ISBN 9780972729772
  2. 2.
    Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    ISBN 9780521766555
  3. 3.
    Sawtooth Software. Market Simulator Models (Lighthouse Studio Manual): First Choice, Share of Preference, Randomized First Choice, Purchase Likelihood, and Utility methods.

You have read it. What now?

Cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Conjoint Market Simulator. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/marketing-research/conjoint-market-simulator