Metodes pierādījumu reģistrs

Multiple case-based interpretive phenomenological analysis

Multiple case-based interpretive phenomenological analysis (multi-case IPA) applies the close, idiographic reading of IPA to a set of purposively selected cases, conducting detailed within-case analysis before systematically comparing themes across cases. The approach retains IPA's commitment to understanding individual lived experience in depth while allowing the researcher to identify convergent and divergent patterns across structurally similar situations or participant groups.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Avota reģistrs

Atsauces kopētas tieši no metodes avota reģistra. Tās nenozīmē nekādu apgalvojumu līmeņa verifikāciju.

Multiple Case-Based Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis

Taksonomiskās metodes reģistrs · process-pipeline / qualitative

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. · ISBN 978-1412908344
Smith, J. A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretive phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11(2), 261–271. · DOI 10.1080/08870449608400256

Atvērt pilnu metodi

Kurēti apgalvojumi

Apgalvojumi saglabāti pierādījumu reģistrā, katram ar savu novērtējumu.

Vēl nav kurētu apgalvojumu

Šis skatījums neizgudro apgalvojumu novērtējumu, ja reģistrā tā nav.

Saistītās metodes

Ģenerēts no metodes grafika un parādīts kā mašīnas ieteiktas attiecības — netiek izvirzīts neviens pierādījumu apgalvojums.

Taxonomic bucketComparative Case Studymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyHermeneutic Phenomenologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketLongitudinal Interpretive Phenomenological Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMultiple-Case Studymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPhenomenologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.