Metodes pierādījumu reģistrs

Most Different Systems Design

The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Avota reģistrs

Atsauces kopētas tieši no metodes avota reģistra. Tās nenozīmē nekādu apgalvojumu līmeņa verifikāciju.

Most Different Systems Design (Comparative Method of Agreement)

Taksonomiskās metodes reģistrs · process-pipeline / political-science

Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. · ISBN 9780471701422
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. · DOI 10.1177/1065912907313077
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · ISBN 9780521676564

Atvērt pilnu metodi

Kurēti apgalvojumi

Apgalvojumi saglabāti pierādījumu reģistrā, katram ar savu novērtējumu.

Vēl nav kurētu apgalvojumu

Šis skatījums neizgudro apgalvojumu novērtējumu, ja reģistrā tā nav.

Saistītās metodes

Ģenerēts no metodes grafika un parādīts kā mašīnas ieteiktas attiecības — netiek izvirzīts neviens pierādījumu apgalvojums.

Taxonomic bucketMost Similar Systems Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.See alsoProcess Tracingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyQualitative Comparative Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.