Metodes pierādījumu reģistrs

Democratic Peace Analysis

Democratic peace analysis is the empirical study of the proposition that democracies rarely or never fight one another. Building on the dyadic research design crystallized by Maoz and Russett (1993), it codes the regime type of each state, constructs dyad-years, and models the probability of militarized conflict as a function of joint democracy alongside controls for power, contiguity, alliances, and trade. The approach has produced one of the most robust empirical regularities in international relations and a long debate over whether shared norms or institutional structures account for it.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Avota reģistrs

Atsauces kopētas tieši no metodes avota reģistra. Tās nenozīmē nekādu apgalvojumu līmeņa verifikāciju.

Empirical Analysis of the Democratic Peace

Taksonomiskās metodes reģistrs · process-pipeline / international-relations

Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638. · DOI 10.2307/2938740

Atvērt pilnu metodi

Kurēti apgalvojumi

Apgalvojumi saglabāti pierādījumu reģistrā, katram ar savu novērtējumu.

Vēl nav kurētu apgalvojumu

Šis skatījums neizgudro apgalvojumu novērtējumu, ja reģistrā tā nav.

Saistītās metodes

Ģenerēts no metodes grafika un parādīts kā mašīnas ieteiktas attiecības — netiek izvirzīts neviens pierādījumu apgalvojums.

Taxonomic bucketDyadic Conflict Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMilitarized Interstate Dispute Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPolity Score Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.