Metodes pierādījumu reģistrs

Comparative Historical Analysis

Comparative historical analysis (CHA) is a macro-causal research tradition that explains large-scale outcomes — revolutions, regime change, welfare states, development paths — by systematically comparing a small number of cases reconstructed in depth across historical time. It combines cross-case comparison with close attention to temporality: sequences, timing, critical junctures, and path dependence. Associated with Barrington Moore, Theda Skocpol, and codified by Mahoney and Rueschemeyer, CHA treats history not as background but as the medium through which causes operate.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Avota reģistrs

Atsauces kopētas tieši no metodes avota reģistra. Tās nenozīmē nekādu apgalvojumu līmeņa verifikāciju.

Comparative Historical Analysis (Macro-Causal Comparison of Cases over Time)

Taksonomiskās metodes reģistrs · process-pipeline / political-science

Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.) (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · ISBN 9780521016452
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · ISBN 9780521294997

Atvērt pilnu metodi

Kurēti apgalvojumi

Apgalvojumi saglabāti pierādījumu reģistrā, katram ar savu novērtējumu.

Vēl nav kurētu apgalvojumu

Šis skatījums neizgudro apgalvojumu novērtējumu, ja reģistrā tā nav.

Saistītās metodes

Ģenerēts no metodes grafika un parādīts kā mašīnas ieteiktas attiecības — netiek izvirzīts neviens pierādījumu apgalvojums.

Same method familyMost Different Systems Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMost Similar Systems Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.See alsoProcess Tracingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyQualitative Comparative Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.