Lewati ke kontenScholarGate
PerpustakaanPerpustakaan sayaMejaReview StudioAsisten
Masuk
Team Faultline Measurement/Bukti
Catatan bukti metode

Team Faultline Measurement

Team faultline measurement quantifies the hypothetical dividing lines that can split a work group into relatively homogeneous subgroups based on the alignment of several member attributes at once. Dora Lau and Keith Murnighan introduced the faultline concept in 1998, arguing that what matters is not how diverse a group is on any single attribute but how strongly multiple attributes line up to create a clean cleavage — for example, when all the older members are also the men and the engineers, while all the younger members are the women and the marketers. Thatcher, Jehn, and Zanutto operationalized the idea in 2003 with the Fau index of faultline strength and a companion measure of faultline distance, and tested their effects on conflict and performance. Later work by Meyer and Glenz compared the proliferating measures and proposed an average-silhouette-width approach that can handle more than two subgroups. The method turns an intuition about subgroup splits into a reproducible number that can be entered into models of team process and outcomes.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Catatan sumber

Kutipan disalin apa adanya dari catatan sumber metode. Tidak ada verifikasi tingkat klaim yang disimpulkan darinya.

Team Faultline Measurement (Hypothetical Dividing Lines in Work Group Composition)
Catatan metode taksonomi · process-pipeline / organizational-behavior
  • Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325-340. · DOI 10.5465/amr.1998.533229
  • Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(3), 217-241. · DOI 10.1023/A:1023325406946
  • Meyer, B., & Glenz, A. (2013). Team faultline measures: A computational comparison and a new approach to multiple subgroups. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 393-424. · DOI 10.1177/1094428113484970
Buka metode lengkap

Klaim yang dikurasi

Klaim tersimpan dalam buku besar bukti, masing-masing dengan penilaiannya sendiri.

Belum ada klaim yang dikurasi

Tampilan ini tidak menciptakan penilaian klaim ketika buku besar tidak memilikinya.

Metode terkait

Dihasilkan dari grafik metode dan ditampilkan sebagai relasi yang disarankan mesin — tidak ada klaim bukti yang disimpulkan.

Same method familyMultitrait-Multimethod Matrixmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyOrganizational Network Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainPsychological Empowerment Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Status bukti

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sumber

3 kutipan tercatat, disalin dari catatan sumber metode.

Tindakan

Buka halaman metode
ScholarGate

Perpustakaan rujukan berbasis konten untuk metode penelitian — apa itu setiap metode, bagaimana cara kerjanya, dan dari mana asalnya.

Data terbuka (CC-BY)

Jelajahi

  • Perpustakaan
  • Cari metode…
  • Jelajahi per bidang
  • Bidang
  • Perjalanan
  • Bandingkan
  • Metode yang mana?

Referensi

  • Bidang
  • Atlas
  • Glosarium
  • Metodologi
  • Filosofi

Ruang kerja

  • Perpustakaan saya
  • Meja
  • Obrolan

Perusahaan

  • Tentang
  • Harga
  • Kontak
  • Usulkan metode

Entri dihimpun dari sumber yang telah diterbitkan sebagai rujukan. Memverifikasi keakuratan dan kesesuaian setiap informasi untuk penggunaan Anda sendiri tetap menjadi tanggung jawab Anda.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Perpustakaan rujukan metode penelitian
  • Privasi
  • Kuki
Ketentuan
  • Hapus akun