Lewati ke kontenScholarGate
PerpustakaanPerpustakaan sayaMejaReview StudioAsisten
Masuk
Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data/Bukti
Catatan bukti metode

Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data

The percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) is a simple nonoverlap effect-size index for single-case (single-subject) research, introduced by Scruggs, Mastropieri, and Casto in 1987 to enable quantitative synthesis of studies that report data graphically rather than as group statistics. PND quantifies how strongly an intervention shifted a behavior by computing the percentage of intervention-phase data points that exceed the single most extreme baseline data point in the direction of desired change. Because it requires only the graphed data and a ruler, PND became one of the most widely used effect sizes in meta-analyses of single-case research in special education, rehabilitation, and behavior analysis. Its very simplicity, however, brings well-documented weaknesses — a ceiling at 100 percent, extreme sensitivity to a single outlying baseline point, and blindness to trend — which motivated later nonoverlap-plus-trend indices such as Parker and colleagues' 2011 Tau-U. PND is best understood as a fast, interpretable, but coarse first look at single-case effect magnitude.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Catatan sumber

Kutipan disalin apa adanya dari catatan sumber metode. Tidak ada verifikasi tingkat klaim yang disimpulkan darinya.

Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data (PND Nonoverlap Effect-Size Index for Single-Case Research)
Catatan metode taksonomi · process-pipeline / disability-studies
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24-33. · DOI 10.1177/074193258700800206
  • Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284-299. · DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
Buka metode lengkap

Klaim yang dikurasi

Klaim tersimpan dalam buku besar bukti, masing-masing dengan penilaiannya sendiri.

Belum ada klaim yang dikurasi

Tampilan ini tidak menciptakan penilaian klaim ketika buku besar tidak memilikinya.

Metode terkait

Dihasilkan dari grafik metode dan ditampilkan sebagai relasi yang disarankan mesin — tidak ada klaim bukti yang disimpulkan.

Same method familyAlternating Treatments Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyChanging Criterion Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySingle-Case Experimental Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Status bukti

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sumber

2 kutipan tercatat, disalin dari catatan sumber metode.

Tindakan

Buka halaman metode
ScholarGate

Perpustakaan rujukan berbasis konten untuk metode penelitian — apa itu setiap metode, bagaimana cara kerjanya, dan dari mana asalnya.

Data terbuka (CC-BY)

Jelajahi

  • Perpustakaan
  • Cari metode…
  • Jelajahi per bidang
  • Bidang
  • Perjalanan
  • Bandingkan
  • Metode yang mana?

Referensi

  • Bidang
  • Atlas
  • Glosarium
  • Metodologi
  • Filosofi

Ruang kerja

  • Perpustakaan saya
  • Meja
  • Obrolan

Perusahaan

  • Tentang
  • Harga
  • Kontak
  • Usulkan metode

Entri dihimpun dari sumber yang telah diterbitkan sebagai rujukan. Memverifikasi keakuratan dan kesesuaian setiap informasi untuk penggunaan Anda sendiri tetap menjadi tanggung jawab Anda.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Perpustakaan rujukan metode penelitian
  • Privasi
  • Kuki
Ketentuan
  • Hapus akun