Lewati ke kontenScholarGate
PerpustakaanPerpustakaan sayaMejaReview StudioAsisten
Masuk
Literary Warrant Analysis/Bukti
Catatan bukti metode

Literary Warrant Analysis

Literary warrant analysis is the method of justifying the classes and terms of a knowledge-organization system by reference to the actual content of a domain's published literature, rather than to abstract logic or a designer's intuition. The principle, traceable to E. Wyndham Hulme's 1911 idea that classification should be warranted by the books that exist, was given an empirical, corpus-based operationalization by Clare Beghtol in her study of fiction studies, where she used subject descriptors in a bibliographic database to quantify how strongly the domain's literature supported particular concepts and where the field reached consensus. Within Hjørland and Albrechtsen's domain-analysis programme, literary warrant is the empirical anchor that ties a classification or thesaurus to the discourse it serves. The analysis assembles a representative corpus, extracts and counts concepts, measures their warrant, gauges consensus, and lets that evidence determine what the system should contain and how finely it should distinguish.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Catatan sumber

Kutipan disalin apa adanya dari catatan sumber metode. Tidak ada verifikasi tingkat klaim yang disimpulkan darinya.

Literary Warrant Analysis (Grounding Classes and Terms in Published Literature)
Catatan metode taksonomi · process-pipeline / library-information-science
  • Beghtol, C. (1995). Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: The case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 30-44. · DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199501)46:1<30::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-F
  • Hjørland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425. · DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<400::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Y
Buka metode lengkap

Klaim yang dikurasi

Klaim tersimpan dalam buku besar bukti, masing-masing dengan penilaiannya sendiri.

Belum ada klaim yang dikurasi

Tampilan ini tidak menciptakan penilaian klaim ketika buku besar tidak memilikinya.

Metode terkait

Dihasilkan dari grafik metode dan ditampilkan sebagai relasi yang disarankan mesin — tidak ada klaim bukti yang disimpulkan.

Taxonomic bucketDomain Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyFacet Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyThesaurus Constructionmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Status bukti

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sumber

2 kutipan tercatat, disalin dari catatan sumber metode.

Tindakan

Buka halaman metode
ScholarGate

Perpustakaan rujukan berbasis konten untuk metode penelitian — apa itu setiap metode, bagaimana cara kerjanya, dan dari mana asalnya.

Data terbuka (CC-BY)

Jelajahi

  • Perpustakaan
  • Cari metode…
  • Jelajahi per bidang
  • Bidang
  • Perjalanan
  • Bandingkan
  • Metode yang mana?

Referensi

  • Bidang
  • Atlas
  • Glosarium
  • Metodologi
  • Filosofi

Ruang kerja

  • Perpustakaan saya
  • Meja
  • Obrolan

Perusahaan

  • Tentang
  • Harga
  • Kontak
  • Usulkan metode

Entri dihimpun dari sumber yang telah diterbitkan sebagai rujukan. Memverifikasi keakuratan dan kesesuaian setiap informasi untuk penggunaan Anda sendiri tetap menjadi tanggung jawab Anda.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Perpustakaan rujukan metode penelitian
  • Privasi
  • Kuki
Ketentuan
  • Hapus akun