Catatan bukti metode

Citation Context Analysis

Citation context analysis looks past the bare count of citations to ask why and how a work is cited, by reading the text surrounding each in-text reference and classifying its function, sentiment, and content. Where ordinary citation counting treats every reference as an equal vote, this method recognizes that citations differ: some are central to a paper's argument and others merely perfunctory, some confirm a cited finding and others dispute it, some use a method and others only mention a concept. Moravcsik and Murugesan's 1975 study of theoretical physics introduced the now-classic functional distinctions (conceptual versus operational, organic versus perfunctory, evolutionary versus juxtapositional, confirmative versus negational) and found that a large share of citations were perfunctory, casting doubt on citation counts as pure quality measures. Tahamtan and Bornmann's review situates this work within the broader question of what citation counts actually measure.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Catatan sumber

Kutipan disalin apa adanya dari catatan sumber metode. Tidak ada verifikasi tingkat klaim yang disimpulkan darinya.

Citation Context Analysis (Citation Function, Sentiment, and Content)

Catatan metode taksonomi · process-pipeline / library-information-science

Buka metode lengkap

Klaim yang dikurasi

Klaim tersimpan dalam buku besar bukti, masing-masing dengan penilaiannya sendiri.

Belum ada klaim yang dikurasi

Tampilan ini tidak menciptakan penilaian klaim ketika buku besar tidak memilikinya.

Metode terkait

Dihasilkan dari grafik metode dan ditampilkan sebagai relasi yang disarankan mesin — tidak ada klaim bukti yang disimpulkan.

Same method familyCitation Analysis for Collection Developmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyReference Accuracy Studymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.