MACTOR Actor Strategy Analysis
Also known as: MACTOR, Actor Strategy Analysis, Matrix of Alliances and Conflicts, Methode des Acteurs
MACTOR — Matrix of Alliances and Conflicts: Tactics, Objectives, and Recommendations — is the actor-analysis method in Michel Godet's la prospective toolkit, designed to study the strategy game among the players who shape a system's future. Where structural analysis with MICMAC maps variables, MACTOR maps actors: it builds a matrix of the direct means of action each actor can exert on the others, from which it derives competitive-strength coefficients (the Ri ratios) that gauge each actor's power, and a second matrix recording where each actor stands, for or against, on the contested objectives at stake. By weighting actors' positions by their power and comparing them objective by objective, MACTOR computes the convergences and divergences among actors, revealing potential alliances, latent conflicts, and the balance of power. The result is a strategic diagnosis that informs scenario construction by exposing which futures the actor field would support or resist.
Key highlights
- Makes the strategic game among stakeholders explicit, mapping alliances and conflicts that trend-based analysis ignores.
- Weights actors' positions by their power through the Ri coefficients, so the picture reflects capacity to act, not just preferences.
- Captures both direct and indirect leverage among actors, surfacing influence exerted through third parties.
- Produces actionable convergence and divergence maps that directly inform which scenarios are politically feasible.
Intuition
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
How it works
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
When to use it
Use MACTOR when the evolution of a system is strongly shaped by the strategies of identifiable stakeholders and you need to understand the power relations, alliances, and conflicts among them before constructing scenarios. It fits the actor-analysis stage of a la prospective study, downstream of MICMAC's variable diagnosis, in problems — public policy, territorial development, industry transformation, contested transitions — where who wants what and who can do what is decisive. It is most useful when a knowledgeable panel can credibly assess actors' mutual influence and their stances on the key objectives. It is less appropriate when the actor field is diffuse or unidentifiable, when the system is driven mainly by impersonal forces rather than strategic players, or when stakeholders' positions cannot be reliably judged, since the analysis is only as sound as the expert assessments of power and position that feed it.
Strengths & limitations
- Makes the strategic game among stakeholders explicit, mapping alliances and conflicts that trend-based analysis ignores.
- Weights actors' positions by their power through the Ri coefficients, so the picture reflects capacity to act, not just preferences.
- Captures both direct and indirect leverage among actors, surfacing influence exerted through third parties.
- Produces actionable convergence and divergence maps that directly inform which scenarios are politically feasible.
- It depends entirely on expert judgements of actor influence and positions, which are subjective and may be contested.
- Actors' real strategies are often ambiguous, hidden, or shifting, so a static snapshot can mislead about future behaviour.
- Reducing power to a single Ri coefficient and positions to a few categories simplifies rich political dynamics.
- It does not model how alliances and conflicts evolve over time, treating the actor game as fixed at the moment of assessment.
Common pitfalls
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
Applications
This section is available to Pro members. Upgrade to Pro
Frequently asked
What do the Ri coefficients measure?
The Ri coefficients summarise each actor's competitive strength or power within the field. An actor's score rises with the total means of action it exerts on the other actors and falls with the influence others exert on it, and the calculation also folds in indirect leverage transmitted through third actors. The resulting ratio places every actor on a common scale from dominant to dominated. The coefficients matter because MACTOR weights actors' positions on objectives by their Ri, so the analysis reflects not merely what each actor wants but how much capacity it has to make that want prevail.
How does MACTOR relate to MICMAC?
They are complementary modules of la prospective addressing different objects. MICMAC performs structural analysis on the system's variables, classifying them by influence and dependence to find the key drivers. MACTOR performs actor analysis on the players, mapping their power, positions, and alliances. The usual sequence runs MICMAC first to identify which variables govern the system, then MACTOR to analyse the stakeholders who contest those variables, and finally morphological scenario building informed by both. MICMAC tells you what factors matter; MACTOR tells you who is fighting over them and who is likely to win.
What is the difference between convergence and divergence?
Convergence and divergence describe how actors relate across the set of objectives. Two actors converge to the degree they take the same side — both favourable or both opposed — on the same objectives, signalling a potential alliance. They diverge to the degree they take opposite sides, signalling latent conflict. MACTOR sums these agreements and disagreements across all objectives, weighted by actor power and the intensity of positions, to produce convergence and divergence matrices and network maps. Reading them shows which clusters of actors might cooperate and which pairs are antagonists, which is the core strategic insight the method delivers.
Sources
- 1.Godet, M. (2006). Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool (2nd ed.). Economica.ISBN 9782717852448
You have read it. What now?
Cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). MACTOR Actor Strategy Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/futures-foresight-studies/mactor-actor-analysis