Cosponsorship Network Analysis
Cosponsorship network analysis treats legislative collaboration as a social network: when legislators cosponsor one another's bills, they form ties, and the resulting web of connections can be measured with the tools of network science. Introduced to congressional studies by James Fowler in 2006, it turns the public record of who signed on to whose bills into a graph among lawmakers, revealing who is central and influential, how connected the chamber is, and which clusters of legislators form coalitions. With inferential network models such as ERGMs, researchers move from describing the network to explaining why ties form.
Dossier source
Citations copiées telles quelles du dossier source de la méthode. Aucune vérification au niveau de la revendication n'en est déduite.
- Fowler, J. H. (2006). Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks. Political Analysis, 14(4), 456–487. · DOI 10.1093/pan/mpl002
- Cranmer, S. J., & Desmarais, B. A. (2011). Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models. Political Analysis, 19(1), 66–86. · DOI 10.1093/pan/mpr032
Revendications organisées
Revendications enregistrées dans le registre de preuves, chacune avec sa propre évaluation.
Cette vue n'invente pas d'évaluation de revendication lorsque le registre n'en contient aucune.
Méthodes apparentées
Généré à partir du graphe de méthodes et présenté comme des relations suggérées par la machine — aucune revendication de preuve n'est déduite.