Computer-Adaptive Functioning Testing
Computer-adaptive functioning testing applies the logic of computerized adaptive testing to the measurement of functioning and disability outcomes, such as physical function, mobility, and daily activity. Instead of administering a fixed list of items to everyone, it draws on a precalibrated item response theory item bank and an algorithm that tailors the test to each respondent in real time. After each answer, the algorithm updates its estimate of the person's underlying function level and selects the next item that will be most informative at that estimate, continuing until a target precision is reached or a maximum number of items is administered. The approach was central to the United States PROMIS initiative, whose physical-function item bank Rose and colleagues evaluated in 2008 and whose first wave of adaptive instruments Cella and colleagues described in 2010. The result, framed here specifically for disability and rehabilitation outcomes, is measurement that achieves high precision with far fewer items than a fixed questionnaire, reducing respondent burden for people who may already face fatigue or communication barriers.
Dossier source
Citations copiées telles quelles du dossier source de la méthode. Aucune vérification au niveau de la revendication n'en est déduite.
- Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Becker, J., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2008). Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(1), 17-33. · DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.025
- Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179-1194. · DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
Revendications organisées
Revendications enregistrées dans le registre de preuves, chacune avec sa propre évaluation.
Cette vue n'invente pas d'évaluation de revendication lorsque le registre n'en contient aucune.
Méthodes apparentées
Généré à partir du graphe de méthodes et présenté comme des relations suggérées par la machine — aucune revendication de preuve n'est déduite.