Best-Worst Scaling of Food Values
Best-worst scaling of food values measures how much consumers care about a fixed set of food attributes — safety, price, taste, nutrition, naturalness, origin, environmental impact, fairness, and so on — by repeatedly asking them to pick the most and least important value from small subsets. Jayson Lusk and Brian Briggeman's 2009 article 'Food Values' introduced this specific application, adapting the best-worst (maximum-difference) scaling method that Finn and Louviere pioneered for food-safety research. Rather than rating each value on a 1-to-5 scale, where everything tends to look important, respondents are forced to trade values off against one another, yielding a discriminating, interval-scaled ranking of what truly drives their food choices and avoiding the scale-use biases that plague conventional importance ratings.
Dossier source
Citations copiées telles quelles du dossier source de la méthode. Aucune vérification au niveau de la revendication n'en est déduite.
- Lusk, J. L., & Briggeman, B. C. (2009). Food Values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(1), 184-196. · DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x
- Finn, A., & Louviere, J. J. (1992). Determining the Appropriate Response to Evidence of Public Concern: The Case of Food Safety. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 12-25. · DOI 10.1177/074391569201100202
Revendications organisées
Revendications enregistrées dans le registre de preuves, chacune avec sa propre évaluation.
Cette vue n'invente pas d'évaluation de revendication lorsque le registre n'en contient aucune.
Méthodes apparentées
Généré à partir du graphe de méthodes et présenté comme des relations suggérées par la machine — aucune revendication de preuve n'est déduite.