Liigu sisuleScholarGate
RaamatukoguMinu raamatukoguTöölaudReview StudioAssistent
Logi sisse
Psychological Contract Measurement/Tõendid
Meetodi tõendite kirje

Psychological Contract Measurement

The psychological contract is an employee's set of beliefs about the reciprocal obligations between themselves and their employer — the unwritten promises that go beyond the formal employment agreement. Denise Rousseau revived and reframed the concept in her 1989 paper, defining it as the individual's perception of mutual exchange terms, and her 1990 study of new hires distinguished transactional obligations (pay for performance, narrow and economic) from relational ones (loyalty and support, broad and open-ended). Measuring the psychological contract means assessing what employees believe each side has promised and whether those promises are kept. Robinson and Morrison's 2000 longitudinal study sharpened the measurement of breach — the perception that the employer has failed to fulfill obligations — and its emotional aftermath, violation. These measures explain why unmet expectations erode trust, satisfaction, citizenship behavior, and retention.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Allikakirje

Tsiteeringud kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest sõna-sõnalt. Nendest ei saa järeldada väidete tasemel kinnitust.

Psychological Contract Measurement (Assessing Beliefs About the Employment Exchange and Its Breach)
Taksonoomiline meetodikirje · latent-structure / organizational-behavior
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121-139. · DOI 10.1007/BF01384942
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 389-400. · DOI 10.1002/job.4030110506
  • Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 525-546. · DOI 10.1002/1099-1379(200008)21:5<525::AID-JOB40>3.0.CO;2-T
Ava täielik meetod

Kureeritud väited

Väited on salvestatud tõendite registrisse, igal oma hinnanguga.

Kureeritud väiteid veel pole

See vaade ei loo väite hinnangut, kui registris seda pole.

Seotud meetodid

Genereeritud meetodigraafist ja kuvatud masina soovitatud seostena – väiteid ei järeldata.

Used in the same domainAffective Events Theorymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRole Conflict and Ambiguity Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Often confused withTeam Mental Modelsmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Tõendite olek

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Allikad

3 salvestatud tsiteeringut, kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest.

Toimingud

Ava meetodi leht
ScholarGate

Sisukeskne teatmekogu uurimismeetoditest — mis iga meetod on, kuidas see töötab ja kust see pärineb.

Avaandmed (CC-BY)

Avasta

  • Raamatukogu
  • Otsi meetodeid…
  • Sirvi valdkonna järgi
  • Valdkonnad
  • Teekond
  • Võrdle
  • Milline meetod?

Viited

  • Valdkonnad
  • Atlas
  • Sõnastik
  • Metoodika
  • Filosoofia

Tööruum

  • Minu raamatukogu
  • Töölaud
  • Vestlus

Ettevõte

  • Meist
  • Hinnad
  • Kontakt
  • Soovita meetodit

Kirjed on koostatud avaldatud allikate põhjal viiteotstarbel. Teabe õigsuse ja sobivuse kontrollimine teie enda kasutuse jaoks jääb teie vastutusele.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Uurimismeetodite teatmekogu
  • Privaatsus
  • Küpsised
  • Tingimused
Kustuta konto