Liigu sisuleScholarGate
RaamatukoguMinu raamatukoguTöölaudReview StudioAssistent
Logi sisse
Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data/Tõendid
Meetodi tõendite kirje

Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data

The percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) is a simple nonoverlap effect-size index for single-case (single-subject) research, introduced by Scruggs, Mastropieri, and Casto in 1987 to enable quantitative synthesis of studies that report data graphically rather than as group statistics. PND quantifies how strongly an intervention shifted a behavior by computing the percentage of intervention-phase data points that exceed the single most extreme baseline data point in the direction of desired change. Because it requires only the graphed data and a ruler, PND became one of the most widely used effect sizes in meta-analyses of single-case research in special education, rehabilitation, and behavior analysis. Its very simplicity, however, brings well-documented weaknesses — a ceiling at 100 percent, extreme sensitivity to a single outlying baseline point, and blindness to trend — which motivated later nonoverlap-plus-trend indices such as Parker and colleagues' 2011 Tau-U. PND is best understood as a fast, interpretable, but coarse first look at single-case effect magnitude.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Allikakirje

Tsiteeringud kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest sõna-sõnalt. Nendest ei saa järeldada väidete tasemel kinnitust.

Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data (PND Nonoverlap Effect-Size Index for Single-Case Research)
Taksonoomiline meetodikirje · process-pipeline / disability-studies
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24-33. · DOI 10.1177/074193258700800206
  • Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284-299. · DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
Ava täielik meetod

Kureeritud väited

Väited on salvestatud tõendite registrisse, igal oma hinnanguga.

Kureeritud väiteid veel pole

See vaade ei loo väite hinnangut, kui registris seda pole.

Seotud meetodid

Genereeritud meetodigraafist ja kuvatud masina soovitatud seostena – väiteid ei järeldata.

Same method familyAlternating Treatments Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyChanging Criterion Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySingle-Case Experimental Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Tõendite olek

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Allikad

2 salvestatud tsiteeringut, kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest.

Toimingud

Ava meetodi leht
ScholarGate

Sisukeskne teatmekogu uurimismeetoditest — mis iga meetod on, kuidas see töötab ja kust see pärineb.

Avaandmed (CC-BY)

Avasta

  • Raamatukogu
  • Otsi meetodeid…
  • Sirvi valdkonna järgi
  • Valdkonnad
  • Teekond
  • Võrdle
  • Milline meetod?

Viited

  • Valdkonnad
  • Atlas
  • Sõnastik
  • Metoodika
  • Filosoofia

Tööruum

  • Minu raamatukogu
  • Töölaud
  • Vestlus

Ettevõte

  • Meist
  • Hinnad
  • Kontakt
  • Soovita meetodit

Kirjed on koostatud avaldatud allikate põhjal viiteotstarbel. Teabe õigsuse ja sobivuse kontrollimine teie enda kasutuse jaoks jääb teie vastutusele.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Uurimismeetodite teatmekogu
  • Privaatsus
  • Küpsised
  • Tingimused
Kustuta konto