Liigu sisuleScholarGate
RaamatukoguMinu raamatukoguTöölaudReview StudioAssistent
Logi sisse
Crowding Norm Curve Analysis/Tõendid
Meetodi tõendite kirje

Crowding Norm Curve Analysis

Crowding norm curve analysis is a field-survey pipeline for measuring how crowded recreationists feel and for translating their evaluations of density into management standards. Its measurement backbone is the standard single-item 9-point crowding question introduced in Shelby and Heberlein's 1986 book Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings, on which visitors rate how crowded a setting felt from 'not at all crowded' (1-2) to 'extremely crowded' (8-9). Perceived crowding is a normative evaluation, not a raw density: it is the negative judgment people make about the number of people or encounters they experienced. Vaske and Shelby's 2008 synthesis of thirty years and more than 180 studies showed that this single item behaves consistently, that respondents scoring 3 or higher are conventionally classified as feeling crowded, and that several ways of summarizing the scale correlate above .90. Paired with acceptability evaluations of different densities, the method yields social norm curves that locate the use level at which conditions become unacceptable — a basis for capacity standards.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Allikakirje

Tsiteeringud kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest sõna-sõnalt. Nendest ei saa järeldada väidete tasemel kinnitust.

Crowding Norm Curve Analysis (Perceived Crowding and Density-Acceptability Norms)
Taksonoomiline meetodikirje · process-pipeline / sport-leisure-studies
  • Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press. · ISBN 9780870714269
  • Vaske, J. J., & Shelby, L. B. (2008). Crowding as a Descriptive Indicator and an Evaluative Standard: Results from 30 Years of Research. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 111-126. · DOI 10.1080/01490400701881341
Ava täielik meetod

Kureeritud väited

Väited on salvestatud tõendite registrisse, igal oma hinnanguga.

Kureeritud väiteid veel pole

See vaade ei loo väite hinnangut, kui registris seda pole.

Seotud meetodid

Genereeritud meetodigraafist ja kuvatud masina soovitatud seostena – väiteid ei järeldata.

Taxonomic bucketEncounter Norm Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Conflict and Coping Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Specialization Continuummachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Substitutability Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Tõendite olek

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Allikad

2 salvestatud tsiteeringut, kopeeritud meetodi allikakirjest.

Toimingud

Ava meetodi leht
ScholarGate

Sisukeskne teatmekogu uurimismeetoditest — mis iga meetod on, kuidas see töötab ja kust see pärineb.

Avaandmed (CC-BY)

Avasta

  • Raamatukogu
  • Otsi meetodeid…
  • Sirvi valdkonna järgi
  • Valdkonnad
  • Teekond
  • Võrdle
  • Milline meetod?

Viited

  • Valdkonnad
  • Atlas
  • Sõnastik
  • Metoodika
  • Filosoofia

Tööruum

  • Minu raamatukogu
  • Töölaud
  • Vestlus

Ettevõte

  • Meist
  • Hinnad
  • Kontakt
  • Soovita meetodit

Kirjed on koostatud avaldatud allikate põhjal viiteotstarbel. Teabe õigsuse ja sobivuse kontrollimine teie enda kasutuse jaoks jääb teie vastutusele.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Uurimismeetodite teatmekogu
  • Privaatsus
  • Küpsised
  • Tingimused
Kustuta konto