ScholarGate
Descubrir
BibliotecaMi bibliotecaEscritorioPrevalidaciónReview StudioAsistente
Espacio de trabajo
Comparar
Construye tu estantería

Guarda métodos, organiza colecciones y llévalos a tu escritorio.

Crear cuenta
Biblioteca
 / Explorar
Iniciar sesión
La biblioteca

Explora la ciencia por método, campo y evidencia.

Un solo catálogo de métodos de investigación — aprende cómo funciona cada uno, cuándo usarlo y qué no puede hacer.

6,482 métodos11 campos7 familias de métodos40 idiomas
Atlas de la cienciaMapea la estructura de la ciencia antes de usarla.Campos · métodos · rutas de evidenciaExplorar el mapa
CampoHealth & Medicine716Psychology570Business & Finance410Engineering330Life Sciences263Education261Research Practice
ScholarGate

Una biblioteca de referencia centrada en el contenido sobre métodos de investigación: qué es cada uno, cómo funciona y de dónde procede.

Datos abiertos (CC-BY)

Descubrir

  • Biblioteca
  • Buscar métodos…
  • Explorar por campo
  • Campos
  • Itinerario
  • Comparar
  • ¿Qué método?

Referencia

  • Materias
  • Atlas
  • Glosario
  • Metodología
  • Filosofía

Espacio de trabajo

  • Mi biblioteca
  • Escritorio
  • Chat

Empresa

  • Acerca de
  • Precios
  • Contacto
  • Sugerir un método

Las entradas se recopilan a partir de fuentes publicadas con fines de consulta. Verificar la exactitud y la idoneidad de cualquier información para su propio uso sigue siendo su responsabilidad.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Biblioteca de referencia de métodos de investigación
  • Privacidad
  • Cookies
  • Términos
  • Eliminar cuenta
248
Natural Sciences236
Social Sciences185
Environment & Sustainability160
Law30
MétodoEstadística1,836IA y aprendizaje automático1,661Ciencias de la decisión932Métodos de investigación1,354Medición1,745Causalidad y evidencia532Práctica investigadora118
8 métodos en Law · Métodos de investigaciónLimpiar
Métodos en la intersección de tus dos filtros.
OrdenarPopularidadA–ZZ–AMás recientes
field methods

Case Law Analysis

Case law analysis is a systematic method for examining judicial decisions to identify binding legal rules, evolving doctrines, and interpretive trends. Rooted in the common law tradition of stare decisis, it requires the researcher to locate the ratio decidendi — the binding reasoning — of each decision, distinguish it

2 fuentes
field methods

Comparative Doctrinal Legal Research

Comparative doctrinal legal research systematically identifies, expounds, and compares the legal rules, principles, and doctrines governing the same problem across two or more jurisdictions. It combines the internal rigour of doctrinal analysis — mapping the authoritative sources of a single legal system — with the ext

2 fuentes1960
field methods

Comparative Legal Analysis

Comparative legal analysis is a structured research method that examines how two or more legal systems — whether national, regional, or supranational — address a common legal problem. By placing rules, doctrines, and judicial decisions side by side, researchers identify convergences, divergences, and the underlying soc

2 fuentes1900
field methods

Critical Case Law Analysis

Critical case law analysis applies the theoretical tools of Critical Legal Studies (CLS) to the examination of judicial decisions. Rather than accepting legal reasoning at face value, this approach interrogates how courts construct legal arguments, whose interests those arguments serve, and how ideological commitments

2 fuentes1970
field methods

Critical Doctrinal Legal Research

Critical doctrinal legal research combines traditional black-letter legal analysis — systematically mapping the rules, principles, and doctrines found in statutes and case law — with the evaluative lens of critical legal theory. Rather than treating legal doctrine as a neutral or self-contained system, it interrogates

2 fuentes1970
field methods

Evaluation-focused legal content analysis

Evaluation-focused legal content analysis is a systematic method for examining legal texts — statutes, regulations, court decisions, contracts, or policy documents — with an explicit evaluative purpose: to assess whether and how well legal instruments achieve specified goals, standards, or values. It combines the struc

2 fuentes1990
field methods

Legal Content Analysis

Legal content analysis applies the systematic procedures of content analysis to legal texts — statutes, regulations, judicial opinions, treaties, and legal commentaries — in order to identify patterns, themes, and trends across a corpus of legal material. It bridges qualitative legal scholarship and quantitative social

2 fuentes1940
field methods

Longitudinal comparative legal analysis

Longitudinal comparative legal analysis examines how legal rules, doctrines, or institutions develop and diverge across two or more legal systems over an extended period. By combining the spatial dimension of comparative law with the temporal dimension of longitudinal research, it captures not just differences between

2 fuentes1960