Registro de evidencia del método

Duke Activity Status Index

The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that estimates functional capacity—the maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) a patient can achieve—based on their ability to perform common daily activities. Developed by Hlatky and colleagues in 1989, the DASI provides a non-invasive assessment of exercise tolerance and cardiovascular fitness equivalent to formal exercise stress testing, making it invaluable for risk stratification, treatment planning, and prognosis in cardiac and pulmonary populations.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Registro de origen

Citas copiadas textualmente del registro de origen del método. No se infiere ninguna verificación a nivel de afirmación de ellas.

Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)

Registro del método taxonómico · process-pipeline / cardiology

Hlatky, M. A., Boineau, R. E., Higginbotham, M. B., Lee, K. L., Mark, D. B., Califf, R. M., Cobb, F. R., & Pryor, D. B. (1989). A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index). American Journal of Cardiology, 64(10), 651–654. · DOI 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90496-7

Abrir método completo

Afirmaciones curadas

Afirmaciones persistidas en el libro mayor de evidencia, cada una con su propia evaluación.

Aún no hay afirmaciones curadas

Esta vista no inventa una evaluación de afirmación si el libro mayor no tiene ninguna.

Métodos relacionados

Generado a partir del grafo de métodos y mostrado como relaciones sugeridas por la máquina; no se infiere ninguna afirmación de evidencia.

Same method familyKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnairemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMinnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnairemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyNew York Heart Association Functional Classificationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySeattle Angina Questionnairemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.