Best-Worst Scaling of Food Values
Best-worst scaling of food values measures how much consumers care about a fixed set of food attributes — safety, price, taste, nutrition, naturalness, origin, environmental impact, fairness, and so on — by repeatedly asking them to pick the most and least important value from small subsets. Jayson Lusk and Brian Briggeman's 2009 article 'Food Values' introduced this specific application, adapting the best-worst (maximum-difference) scaling method that Finn and Louviere pioneered for food-safety research. Rather than rating each value on a 1-to-5 scale, where everything tends to look important, respondents are forced to trade values off against one another, yielding a discriminating, interval-scaled ranking of what truly drives their food choices and avoiding the scale-use biases that plague conventional importance ratings.
Registro de origen
Citas copiadas textualmente del registro de origen del método. No se infiere ninguna verificación a nivel de afirmación de ellas.
- Lusk, J. L., & Briggeman, B. C. (2009). Food Values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(1), 184-196. · DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x
- Finn, A., & Louviere, J. J. (1992). Determining the Appropriate Response to Evidence of Public Concern: The Case of Food Safety. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 12-25. · DOI 10.1177/074391569201100202
Afirmaciones curadas
Afirmaciones persistidas en el libro mayor de evidencia, cada una con su propia evaluación.
Esta vista no inventa una evaluación de afirmación si el libro mayor no tiene ninguna.
Métodos relacionados
Generado a partir del grafo de métodos y mostrado como relaciones sugeridas por la máquina; no se infiere ninguna afirmación de evidencia.