Network Scale-Up Method
The network scale-up method (NSUM) estimates the size of a hidden population — such as undocumented migrants or members of a stigmatized group — by asking ordinary people in a general survey how many members of that population they personally know. Developed by Killworth, McCarty, Bernard, and colleagues and formalized in their 1998 Evaluation Review paper, it rests on a simple bookkeeping idea: if you know roughly how many people each respondent knows in total, and you observe how many of those acquaintances belong to the hidden group, you can scale that fraction up to the whole society. The trick to recovering the total acquaintance count is to ask about several groups whose sizes are already known — people named Michael, nurses, women who gave birth last year — and use the responses to calibrate each respondent's personal-network size. Bernard and colleagues' 2010 review brought the method into mainstream public-health surveillance and emphasized two crucial corrections: transmission bias, because people often do not know which of their acquaintances belong to a hidden group, and barrier effects, because the hidden group may be socially clustered away from typical respondents. For migration research NSUM is attractive precisely because it never requires contacting migrants directly; it infers their numbers from the social fabric of the wider population.
Εγγραφή πηγής
Οι παραπομπές αντιγράφονται αυτούσιες από την εγγραφή πηγής της μεθόδου. Δεν υπονοείται επαλήθευση σε επίπεδο ισχυρισμού από αυτές.
- Bernard, H. R., Hallett, T., Iovita, A., Johnsen, E. C., Lyerla, R., McCarty, C., Mahy, M., Salganik, M. J., & Stroup, S. (2010). Counting Hard-to-Count Populations: The Network Scale-Up Method for Public Health. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 86(Suppl 2), ii11-ii15. · DOI 10.1136/sti.2010.044446
- Killworth, P. D., McCarty, C., Bernard, H. R., Shelley, G. A., & Johnsen, E. C. (1998). Estimation of Seroprevalence, Rape, and Homelessness in the United States Using a Social Network Approach. Evaluation Review, 22(2), 289-308. · DOI 10.1177/0193841X9802200205
Επιμελημένοι ισχυρισμοί
Οι ισχυρισμοί έχουν αποθηκευτεί στο καθολικό τεκμηρίων, καθένας με τη δική του αξιολόγηση.
Αυτή η προβολή δεν επινοεί αξιολόγηση ισχυρισμού όταν το καθολικό δεν έχει κανέναν.
Σχετικές μέθοδοι
Δημιουργούνται από τον γράφο μεθόδων και εμφανίζονται ως προτεινόμενες από μηχανή σχέσεις — δεν υπονοείται ισχυρισμός τεκμηρίου.