ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Wordfish Scaling×Ideal Point Estimation×
ΠεδίοPolitical SciencePolitical Science
ΟικογένειαLatent structureLatent structure
Έτος προέλευσης20082004
ΔημιουργόςJonathan Slapin and Sven-Oliver ProkschClinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)
ΤύποςUnsupervised latent-position model for word-count dataLatent-variable spatial model of binary choice data
Θεμελιώδης πηγήSlapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI ↗Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςWordfish text scaling, Poisson scaling of texts, Unsupervised text scaling, Wordfish position estimationIdeal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points
Συναφείς44
ΣύνοψηWordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 3 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Wordfish Scaling · Ideal Point Estimation. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-24 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare