ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Τεχνική Delphi με Τριγωνοποίηση×Τεχνική Ονομαστικής Ομάδας×
ΠεδίοΜεθοδολογία ΕπισκοπήσεωνΠοιοτικές Μέθοδοι
ΟικογένειαProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Έτος προέλευσηςDelphi: 1963; triangulation integration: 1970s–1990s1971
ΔημιουργόςNorman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer (Delphi); triangulation principle from Norman DenzinAndré L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de Ven
ΤύποςExpert-consensus data collection with multi-method validationQualitative research method
Θεμελιώδης πηγήDalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467. DOI ↗Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςDelphi with triangulation, mixed-method Delphi, multi-method Delphi, triangulation-enhanced DelphiNGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group method
Συναφείς56
ΣύνοψηThe Triangulated Delphi Technique combines the structured expert-consensus process of the classic Delphi method with deliberate triangulation — integrating data from at least one additional source or method (e.g., systematic literature review, interviews, survey data) to cross-validate findings and enhance the credibility of expert judgments. It retains the iterative, anonymous, multi-round panel format while embedding verification steps that reduce reliance on panel consensus alone.The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Triangulated Delphi Technique · Nominal Group Technique. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-18 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare